Preferences of Women Evaluating Risks of Tamoxifen (POWER) study of preferences for tamoxifen for breast cancer risk reduction
✍ Scribed by Joy Melnikow; Debora Paterniti; Rahman Azari; Christina Kuenneth; Stephen Birch; Miriam Kuppermann; James Nuovo; Janet Keyzer; Stuart Henderson
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2005
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 122 KB
- Volume
- 103
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0008-543X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The objective of this study was to understand the attitudes and preferences of risk‐eligible women regarding use of tamoxifen for breast cancer risk reduction.
METHODS
A cross‐sectional, mixed‐methods interview study was conducted at a university medical center and at community sites. Participants were women who had an estimated 5‐year breast cancer risk ≥ 1.7% and no prior breast cancer. Interviews were conducted in English or Spanish. The interview included a 15‐minute, standardized educational session on the potential benefits and harms of tamoxifen followed by close‐ended and open‐ended questions about participants' inclinations to take tamoxifen and factors important to their decision. A demographic questionnaire, a test on knowledge of potential benefits and harms of tamoxifen, and an interview evaluation were included.
RESULTS
Two hundred fifty‐five women completed interviews. Their estimated mean 5‐year breast cancer risk was 2.8%; and their mean self‐perceived 5‐year risk was 32.7%. After the educational intervention, 45 women (17.6%) were inclined to take tamoxifen. Very high risk women (> 3.5%) were no more inclined to take it than women with lower risk (1.7–3.5%). In a multivariable analysis, lower income, confidence in the effectiveness of tamoxifen, and concern about fractures were associated with being inclined to take it; concern about pulmonary embolism, dyspareunia, cataracts, and low self‐perceived breast cancer risk were associated negatively with taking tamoxifen. Participants expressed concerns about adverse effects.
CONCLUSIONS
Less than 20% of women were interested in tamoxifen after education about potential benefits and harms, despite a very high self‐perceived breast cancer risk. Candidate chemoprevention agents must have few potential adverse effects to achieve widespread acceptance. Cancer 2005. © 2005 American Cancer Society.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract This study evaluated the potential risk factors for breast cancer in Nigerian women using a case–control design of 250 women with breast cancer and their age‐matched female controls. Both cases and controls were recruited from 4 University Teaching Hospitals in Midwestern and Southeaste
Recently, polygenic risk scores (PRS) have been shown to be associated with certain complex diseases. The approach has been based on the contribution of counting multiple alleles associated with disease across independent loci, without requiring compelling evidence that every locus had already achie
## Abstract A population‐based case‐control study was performed to evaluate the risk of endometrial cancer related to tamoxifen or toremifene treatment. All patients with breast cancer diagnosis since 1980 in Finland who subsequently developed an endometrial cancer by the end of 1995 and 3 matched
## Abstract ## BACKGROUND Adjuvant aromatase inhibitors (AIs), instead of or after tamoxifen, are effective in decreasing recurrence in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)‐positive breast cancer. An understanding of which patients are at risk of early recurrence while they are receivi
A self-administered questionnaire was completed by 497 Chinese women in Beijing with histologically confirmed breast cancer and by an equal number of age-and neighborhoodmatched control women. High body weight (71 + kg) was a risk factor for breast cancer in women aged 50 + (RR = I .90), but this ef