## Abstract A central assumption in health utility measurement is that preferences are invariant to the elicitation method used. This assumption is challenged by preference reversals. Previous studies have observed preference reversals between choice and matching tasks and between choice and rankin
β¦ LIBER β¦
Preference reversals and the measurement of environmental values
β Scribed by Julie R. Irwin; Paul Slovic; Sarah Lichtenstein; Gary H. McClelland
- Publisher
- Springer
- Year
- 1993
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 801 KB
- Volume
- 6
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0895-5646
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
New evidence of preference reversals in
β
Han Bleichrodt; Jose Luis Pinto Prades
π
Article
π
2009
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 141 KB
Preference reversals and the analysis of
β
Yoram Amiel; Frank Cowell; Liema Davidovitz; Avraham Polovin
π
Article
π
2007
π
Springer
π
English
β 519 KB
Reversals of preference between compound
β
Rob Ranyard
π
Article
π
1995
π
Springer
π
English
β 991 KB
Choosing realistic values of indifferenc
β
Martin Rogers; Michael Bruen
π
Article
π
1998
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 998 KB
The ELECTRE III outranking model is particularly suited to aiding the choice between project alternatives on the basis of mainly environmental criteria. The model requires values of three criterion thresholds, the indifference threshold (q), the preference threshold ( p) and the veto threshold (u).
The Value of Indirect Measures for Asses
β
A. Roefs; M. Q. Werrij; F. T. Y. Smulders; A. Jansen
π
Article
π
2006
π
SP BirkhΓ€user Verlag Basel
π
English
β 103 KB
Formal axiology and the measurement of v
β
Robert S. Hartman
π
Article
π
1967
π
Springer
π
English
β 536 KB