## Abstract ## BACKGROUND Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the U.S., with an estimated annual economic burden of $5 billion. Clinical trials offer innovative therapeutic options with potentially better outcomes, but their effects on health care costs are disputed. ## METHODS T
Predictors of enrollment in lung cancer clinical trials
✍ Scribed by Wei Du; Shirish M. Gadgeel; Michael S. Simon
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2006
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 77 KB
- Volume
- 106
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0008-543X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Clinical trials may offer patients innovative therapeutic options with potentially better outcomes, which are particularly relevant for patients afflicted with lung carcinoma, because current therapies provide only modest survival benefits. Only approximately 5% of patients with newly diagnosed cancer participate in clinical trials nationwide, and African‐American (AA) patients are particularly under‐represented.
METHODS
To determine predictors of clinical trials enrollment, the authors reviewed the medical records of 427 patients with lung carcinoma (175 AA patients and 252 non‐AA patients) who were eligible for clinical trials between 1994 and 1998 at the Karmanos Cancer Institute in Detroit, Michigan. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association of patient demographic characteristics and clinical trial enrollment.
RESULTS
Ninety‐one patients (21%) were enrolled onto a lung cancer clinical trial during the period of the current study. Enrollment was associated significantly with race (P < 0.001), gender (P = 0.048), age (P = 0.005), and insurance type (P = 0.024). After multivariable adjustment, only race and gender remained significant predictors of enrollment. AA patients were less likely to enroll than non‐AA patients (odds ratio [OR], 0.485; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.243–0.966), and men were more likely than women to enroll (OR, 1.812; 95% CI, 1.033–3.178).
CONCLUSIONS
The current results suggest disparities by race and gender in the enrollment of patients onto lung cancer clinical trials and support the need to improve educational and outreach endeavors that would make clinical trials available to a wider range of eligible patients. Cancer 2006. © 2005 American Cancer Society.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
A prerequisite for the completion of a clinical trial is the accrual of adequate numbers of patients. It is estimated that over 90-95% of all cancer patients are now treated in their local communities by practicing oncologists and are not seen by primary investigators at teaching hospitals. One risk
Evidence shows that the quality of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) affects estimates of intervention efficacy, which is significantly exaggerated in low-quality trials. The present study examines the quality of all 235 RCTs published in HEPATOLOGY from the initiation in 1981 through August 1998. Q
## Abstract ## BACKGROUND The literature continues to report low rates of accrual to cancer clinical trials. Previous studies have examined principally physician‐related or patient‐related barriers. Clinical research associates (CRAs) have a unique perspective on enrollment that has been explored
## BACKGROUND. The study was launched in the mid-1970s to explore the capability of screening by chest X-ray and sputum cytology to be used as an effective component of the lung cancer control program in the Czech Republic, a Central European country with a high and increasing occurrence of lung c