𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Prediction of regulatory interactions in Arabidopsis using gene-expression data and support vector machines

✍ Scribed by Xiaoqing Yu; Taigang Liu; Xiaoqi Zheng; Zhongnan Yang; Jun Wang


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2011
Tongue
English
Weight
153 KB
Volume
49
Category
Article
ISSN
0981-9428

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Identification of regulatory relationships between transcription factors (TFs) and their targets is a central problem in post-genomic biology. In this paper, we apply an approach based on the support vector machine (SVM) and gene-expression data to predict the regulatory interactions in Arabidopsis. A set of 125 experimentally validated TF-target interactions and 750 negative regulatory gene pairs are collected as the training data. Their expression profiles data at 79 experimental conditions are fed to the SVM to perform the prediction. Through the jackknife cross-validation test, we find that the overall prediction accuracy of our approach achieves 88.68%. Our approach could help to widen the understanding of Arabidopsis gene regulatory scheme and may offer a cost-effective alternative to construct the gene regulatory network.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The use of hybrid manifold learning and
✍ Fengyi Lin; Ching-Chiang Yeh; Meng-Yuan Lee πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2011 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 348 KB

The prediction of business failure is an important and challenging issue that has served as the impetus for many academic studies over the past three decades. This paper proposes a hybrid manifold learning approach model which combines both isometric feature mapping (ISOMAP) algorithm and support ve

Variable selection and oversampling in t
✍ Wolfgang HΓ€rdle; Yuh-Jye Lee; Dorothea SchΓ€fer; Yi-Ren Yeh πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 291 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract In the era of Basel II a powerful tool for bankruptcy prognosis is vital for banks. The tool must be precise but also easily adaptable to the bank's objectives regarding the relation of false acceptances (Type I error) and false rejections (Type II error). We explore the suitability of