✦ LIBER ✦

PREDICTION OF INSIGNIFICANT CANCERS: HOW GOOD ARE CURRENT NOMOGRAMS?

✍ Scribed by Currlin, E.; Eichelberg, C.; Chun, K.H.F.; Haese, A.; Steuber, T.; Graefen, M.; Huland, H.

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Comparative Validation of Nomograms Pred

✍ Iremashvili, Viacheslav; Soloway, Mark S.; Pelaez, Lisét; Rosenberg, Daniel L.; 📂 Article 📅 2013 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 565 KB

Preoperative nomograms incorporating mag

✍ Amita Shukla-Dave; Hedvig Hricak; Oguz Akin; Changhong Yu; Kristen L. Zakian; Ka 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 588 KB

How good are empirical predictions of na

✍ Miguel A. Pascual; Oscar O. Iribarne 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 417 KB

How good are predictions of protein seco

✍ Wolfgang Kabsch; Christian Sander 📂 Article 📅 1983 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 358 KB

How good are the Garvey–Kelson predictio

✍ Morales, Irving O. (author);López Vieyra, J. C. (author);Hirsch, J. G. (author); 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 1012 KB

How good are the Garvey–Kelson predictio

✍ Morales, Irving O. (author);López Vieyra, J. C. (author);Hirsch, J. G. (author); 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 1012 KB