Predicting postprocedure bleeding in liver disease
โ Scribed by Robertson D. Davenport
- Book ID
- 102237253
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1992
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 418 KB
- Volume
- 15
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0270-9139
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Readers who wish to contribute t o HEPATOLOGY Elsewhere are requested to write Dr. Jorge J . Gumucio, Editor, indicating topics they would like to comment on.
They are welcome to telephone (313/769-7100, ext. 5796) to express their willingness to contribute, to indicate a specific article they think worthy of comment or to identify potential authors of future HEPATOLOGY Elsewhere commentaries.
These mini-editorials are intended to bring interesting articles to the attention of the readership and t o put these papers into perspective. They may applaud or criticize, amplify, delimit or speculate about the significance of the paper.
The following instructions will apply: (a) The title of the review should prompt the reader's interest in the article to be reviewed. (b) Please include the names of all authors, the exact title of the article and the name of the journal followed by the exact reference. (c) Enclose a legible photocopy of the abstract. (d) The comments should be typed, double spaced and comprise approximately four to five manuscript pages. (e) In addition to the comments, include a short reference list (up to 10 references) containing the names of all authors, using the HEPATOLOGY format (see "Instructions to Authors"). (f) At the close of the comments, include the reviewers' complete names and affiliations. (g) Send the review to the address listed above.
The authors of the original paper will not be requested to prepare a response to be published along with the review. The authors and others, however, have the opportunity to respond in the Correspondence section of HEPATOLOGY Elsewhere, and these comments, along with a short response by the editorialist, will be published as promptly as possible.
The authors' comments must conform to the following style: (a) A high level of professional discussion has to be maintained. Comments that the section editor considers offensive to either the author (in the original review) or to the reviewer (in the author's response) will not be published. (b) The comments should not exceed two double-spaced manuscript pages and five references.
The reviewer has the opportunity of responding to the author's comments using an equal format. Elsewhere will not publish subsequent letters dealing with the same discussion.
Note: Abstracts are reproduced with the permission of the authors and publishers exactly as they appear in the original articles. When an abstract is not published as part of the article under comment or when permission to reproduce the abstract is not forthcoming, an "Editor's Abstract" is prepared instead.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES