𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Predictability of cochlear implant outcome in families

✍ Scribed by Anil K. Lalwani; Cameron L. Budenz; Adam S. Weisstuch; James Babb; J. Thomas Roland Jr.; Susan B. Waltzman


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
84 KB
Volume
119
Category
Article
ISSN
0023-852X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Objectives:

The purpose of this study is to determine if the performance of the first implanted member of a family predicts the performance of subsequently implanted family members.

Study Design:

Retrospective chart review.

Methods:

Seventy‐one cochlear implant recipients, each belonging to a family with two or more implanted members, were the subjects of this study. Routine audiometric measurements and age‐appropriate speech perception tests were performed pre‐ and postoperatively. In addition, length of deafness, age at implantation, etiology, and length of device usage were correlated to outcome.

Results:

All implant recipients within a family showed improvement postimplantation, and the predictive component between family members was strong. Presence of GJB2 mutations and greater age at implantation were predictive of poorer rehabilitative outcome, while length of device usage was associated with improved speech perception scores.

Conclusions:

On average, if the first implanted family member performs well with a cochlear implant, those following will do well; however, GJB2‐related deafness and increased age at implantation are associated with poorer outcome. These findings have important implications for members of families considering cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope, 119:131–136, 2009


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Cochlear implant outcomes in the elderly
✍ AA Orabi; F Al-Zoubi; DJ Mawman; SR Saeed; RT Ramsden πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2003 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 41 KB

UK cochlear implantation outcomes in the elderly have not been previously reported to our knowledge. The aim of this study is to assess the benefits of cochlear implantation in this group so that the purchasing authorities may recognize that healthcare resources are being utilized appropriately.

Implication of mutations in Connexin 31
✍ Eugene A. Chu; Anand N. Mhatre; Lawrence R. Lustig; Anil K. Lalwani πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2001 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 249 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

Mutations in the gene of the gap junction protein Connexin 31 (CX31; other connexin 1 Laboratory of Molecular genes abbreviated by CX+#, i.e. Connexin 30 = CX30) have been demonstrated to be Otology, Epstein Laboratories, responsible for both autosomal dominant and recessive nonsyndromic hereditary