๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Precision of magnetic resonance velocity and acceleration measurements: Theoretical issues and phantom experiments

โœ Scribed by Emmanuel P. Durand; Odile Jolivet; Emmanuel Itti; Jean-Pierre Tasu; Jacques Bittoun


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2001
Tongue
English
Weight
207 KB
Volume
13
Category
Article
ISSN
1053-1807

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Abstract

Magnetic resonance (MR) sequences have been developed for acquiring multiple components of velocity and/or acceleration in a reasonable time and with a single acquisition. They have many parameters that influence the precision of measurements: N~S~, the number of flowโ€encoding steps; NEX, the number of signal accumulations; and N~D~, the number of dimensions. Our aims were to establish a general relationship revealing the precision of these measurements as a function of N~S~, N~D~, and NEX and to validate it by experiments using phantoms. Previous work on precision has been restricted to twoโ€step (N~S~ = 2) or 1D (N~D~ = 1) MR velocity measurements. We describe a comprehensive approach that encompasses both multistep and multidimensional strategies. Our theoretical formula gives the precision of velocity and acceleration measurements. It was validated experimentally with measurements on a rotating disk phantom. This phantom was much easier to handle than fluidโ€based phantoms. It could be used to assess both velocity and acceleration sequences and provided accurate and precise assessments over a wide, adjustable range of values within a single experiment. Increasing each of the three parameters, N~S~, N~D~, and NEX, improves the precision but makes the acquisition time longer. However, if only one parameter is to be assessed, maximizing the number of steps (N~S~) is the most efficient way of improving the precision of measurements; if several parameters are of interest, they should be measured simultaneously. By contrast, increasing the number of signals accumulated (NEX) is the least efficient strategy. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2001;13:445โ€“451. ยฉ 2001 Wileyโ€Liss, Inc.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Estimation of pressure gradients in puls
โœ Jean-Pierre Tasu; Elie Mousseaux; Annie Delouche; Christian Oddou; Odile Jolivet ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 296 KB

A method for estimating pressure gradients from MR images is demonstrated. Making the usual assumption that the flowing medium is a Newtonian fluid, and with appropriate boundary conditions, the inertial forces (or acceleration components of the flow) are proportional to the pressure gradients. The

Effect of acquisition parameters on the
โœ Gerald Greil; Tal Geva; Stephan E. Maier; Andrew J. Powell ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2002 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 317 KB

## Abstract ## Purpose To investigate the effect of acquisition parameters on the accuracy of 2D velocity encoded cine magnetic resonance imaging (VEC MRI) flow measurements. ## Materials and Methods Using a pulsatile flow phantom, throughโ€plane flow measurements were performed on a flexible ves

Consistency of aortic distensibility and
โœ Anas Dogui; Nadjia Kachenoura; Frรฉdรฉrique Frouin; Muriel Lefort; Alain De Cesare ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2011 ๐Ÿ› BioMed Central ๐ŸŒ English โš– 739 KB

## Background Arterial stiffness is considered as an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality, and is increasingly used in clinical practice. This study aimed at evaluating the consistency of the automated estimation of regional and local aortic stiffness indices from cardiovascular magnet