<p>"Singer's theory of rights, an impressive development of social accounts by pragmatists George Herbert Mead and John Dewey, was developed in Operative Rights (1993). This successor volume includes applications, lectures, replies to critics, and clarifications. For Singer, Dewey, and Mead, rights
Pragmatism, rights, and democracy
โ Scribed by Beth J. Singer
- Publisher
- Fordham University Press
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 220
- Series
- Fordham American Philosophy
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
"Singer's theory of rights, an impressive development of social accounts by pragmatists George Herbert Mead and John Dewey, was developed in Operative Rights (1993). This successor volume includes applications, lectures, replies to critics, and clarifications. For Singer, Dewey, and Mead, rights exist only if they are embedded in the operative practices of a community. People have a right in a community if their claim is acknowledged, and if they would acknowledge similar claims by others. Singer's account contrasts with theories of natural rights, which state that humans have rights by virtue of being human. Singer's account also differs from Kantian attempts to derive rights from the necessary conditions of rationality. While denying that rights exist independently of a community's practices, Singer maintains that rights to personal autonomy and authority ought to exist in all communities. Group rights, an anathema among individualistic theories, are from Singer's pragmatist perspective a valuable institution. Singer's discussion of rights appropriate for minority communities (e.g., the Bosnian Muslims and the Canadian Quebecois) is particularly illuminating. Her book is a model of careful reasoning. General libraries, and certainly academic libraries, should have Singer's Operative Rights. The volume under review is a good addition for research libraries and recommended for graduate students and above."[Singer] examines the views of Rousseau, Mill, and T. H. Green on human rights and those of Dewey and G. H. Mead on the relationship between rights and the democratic process...Recommended."--Choice
Pragmatism, Rights, and Democracy is available from the publisher on an open-access basis.
โฆ Table of Contents
Frontmatter
Acknowledgments (page ix)
Preface (page xi)
I ORTHODOXY AND HETERODOXY IN THE THEORY OF RIGHTS
1. Four Principles of Traditional Theories of Rights (page 3)
2. An Alternative to the Dominant Tradition (page 23)
3. Jean-Jacques Rousseau, John Stuart Mill, and Thomas Hill Green on Natural rights (page 42)
II DEMOCRACY AND MULTICULTURALISM
4. The Democratic Solution to Ethnic Pluralism (page 61)
5. Difference, Otherness, and the Creation of Community (page 81)
6. Multiculturalism, Identity, and Minority Rights: Will Kymlicka and the Concept of Special Rights (page 92)
7. Deep Diversity: Charles Taylor and the Politics of Federalism (page 108)
III DEMOCRATIC PRAXIS
8. Pragmatism, Rights, and Democracy (page 121)
9. Reconciling Liberalism and Communitarianism (page 142)
Postscript: But I Have a Right! (page 169)
Bibliography (page 187)
Index (page 197)
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
In Legal Pragmatism, Michael Sullivan looks closely at the place of the individual and community in democratic society. After mapping out a brief history of American legal thinking regarding rights, from communitarianism to liberalism, Sullivan give
This volume of essays is based on Singer's earlier works on the theory of human rights, notably her 1993 book, Operative Rights. It contains several chapters in which she criticizes conventional theories, traditional as well as contemporary, and provides further clarification of her own view. In ad
In Legal Pragmatism, Michael Sullivan looks closely at the place of the individual and community in democratic society. After mapping out a brief history of American legal thinking regarding rights, from communitarianism to liberalism, Sullivan gives a rich and nuanced account of how pragmatism work
A liberal state is a representative democracy constrained by the rule of law. Richard Posner argues for a conception of the liberal state based on pragmatic theories of government. He views the actions of elected officials as guided by interests rather than by reason and the decisions of judges by d
A liberal state is a representative democracy constrained by the rule of law. Richard Posner argues for a conception of the liberal state based on pragmatic theories of government. He views the actions of elected officials as guided by interests rather than by reason and the decisions of judges by d