๐”– Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

๐Ÿ“

Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions

โœ Scribed by Laurel J. Brinton


Publisher
Mouton de Gruyter
Year
1996
Tongue
English
Leaves
429
Series
Topics in English Linguistics 19
Category
Library

โฌ‡  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


The future of English linguistics as envisaged by the editors of Topics in English Linguistics lies in empirical studies which integrate work in English linguistics into general and theoretical linguistics on the one hand, and comparative linguistics on the other. The TiEL series features volumes that present interesting new data and analyses, and above all fresh approaches that contribute to the overall aim of the series, which is to further outstanding research in English linguistics.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Discourse and Pragmatics in Functional G
โœ John H. Connolly, Roel M. Vismans, Christopher S. Butler (eds.) ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2010 ๐Ÿ› De Gruyter Mouton ๐ŸŒ English

Functional Grammar is a linguistic theory in which language is regarded intrinsically as a vehicle of communicative interaction. As such it has a strongly pragmatic orientation, and this book presents the results of some of the most recent research into pragmatics within the Functional Grammar frame

Negation in Early English: Grammatical a
โœ Phillip W Wallage ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2017 ๐Ÿ› Cambridge University Press ๐ŸŒ English

Informed by detailed analysis of data from large-scale diachronic corpora, this book is a comprehensive account of changes to the expression of negation in English. Its methodological approach brings together up-to-date techniques from corpus linguistics and minimalist syntactic analysis to identify

CP 5: Pragmatism and Pragmaticism
โœ Peirce, Charles Sanders & Hartshorne, Charles & Weiss, Paul ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 1935 ๐Ÿ› Harvard University Press ๐ŸŒ English

CP 5.320 Fn P1 p 191: > The word *suppositio* is one of the useful technical terms of the middle ages which was condemned by the purists of the *renaissance* as incorrect. The early logicians made a distinction between *significatio* and *suppositio.* [Cf. Prantl, II, 286ff; III, 51f.] *Significatio