Digressions in argumentative discussion are a kind of failure of relevance. Examination of what actual cases look like reveals several properties of argumentative relevance: (1) The informational relevance of propositions to the truth value of a conclusion should be distinguished from the pragmatic
Pragmatic connectives, argumentative coherence and relevance
β Scribed by Jacques Moeschler
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Year
- 1989
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 960 KB
- Volume
- 3
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0920-427X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
This article is concerned with pragmatic connectives and their uses in discursive argumentation. Three approaches to pragmatic connectives will be presented:
(1) argumentation theory, which implies a conception of pragmatics integrated within semantics, and a specific type of argumentative rules, called 'topoi'; (2) discourse structure theory, which associates a function in the structuring of discourse sequences to pragmatic connectives; (3) relevance theory, which constitutes a cognitive pragmatic theory, in which no specific principle is associated to linguistic items. However, two main functions to pragmatic connectives can be proposed: the facilitation of inferences, and the access to relevance. The final purpose of this article is to indicate how argumentative effects in discourse can be explained in a cognitively-based pragmatic theory.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
This paper deals with the explanation the maxim of relevance provides for the way utterances in argumentative discourse follow each other in an orderly and coherent fashion. Several senses are distinguished in which utterances can be considered relevant. It is argued that an utterance can be conside
This paper is concerned with vagueness in language, its relation to logicophilosophical questions on the one hand, and to so-called syncategorematic terms and their linguistic use on the other hand. It attempts to show that it is not language itself which is vague but rather the way we use it.
Alvin Plantinga has recently and forcefully argued that belief in God is properly basic for some persons. ~ Positively, he claims that a basic belief in God can be "entirely acceptable, desirable, right, proper, and rational" (1983:39). Negatively, he holds that neither classical foundationalism nor
Illustrations of how ideas from community psychology may be integrated with clinical psychological thinking and practice are described from the perspective of a clinical psychologist working in the NHS. The intentions are to consider socially relevant conceptualizations of the causes of people's wel
## Abstract Here, we describe a family of methods based on residueβresidue connectivity for characterizing binding sites and apply variants of the method to various types of proteinβligand complexes including proteases, allostericβbinding sites, correctly and incorrectly docked poses, and inhibitor