Potentially inappropriate medication use in hospitalized elders
β Scribed by Michael B. Rothberg; Penelope S. Pekow; Fengjuan Liu; Beatriz Korc-Grodzicki; Maura J. Brennan; Sandra Bellantonio; Mark Heelon; Peter K. Lindenauer
- Book ID
- 102338619
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 177 KB
- Volume
- 3
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1553-5592
- DOI
- 10.1002/jhm.290
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Prescribing of potentially harmful medications has not been well documented in hospitals.
OBJECTIVE:
The objective of the study was to determine the rate of and factors associated with potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) prescribing in a large inpatient sample.
DESIGN:
The study was a retrospective cohort of the period between September 1, 2002, and June 30, 2005. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify patient, physician, and hospital characteristics associated with PIM prescribing.
SETTING:
The study collected data from 384 US hospitals.
PATIENTS:
The sample was composed of patients aged β₯65 years admitted with 1 or more of 7 common medical diagnoses.
MEASUREMENTS:
The percentage of patients prescribed PIMs as defined using a modified Beers list was measured. Multivariableβadjusted odds ratios for PIM use were computed.
RESULTS:
Of the 493,971 patients, 49% received at least 1 PIM, and 6% received 3 or more, most commonly promethazine, diphenhydramine, and propoxyphene. Patient, physician, and hospital characteristics were all associated with PIM use. Patients with myocardial infarction or heart failure were most likely (61% and 52% vs. 46% for pneumonia), men (47% vs. 49% for women) and those in managed care plans (44% vs. 49% for other plans) were less likely, and patients β₯85 years were least likely (42% vs. 53% for patients aged 65β74 years) to receive PIMs (P < .0001 for all comparisons). For highβseverity PIMs, internists and hospitalists had similar prescribing rates (33%), cardiologists had a higher rate (48%), and geriatricians had the lowest rate (24%). The proportion of elders receiving PIMs ranged from 34% in the Northeast to 55% in the South, and variation at the individual hospital level was extreme. At 7 hospitals, PIMs were never prescribed.
CONCLUSIONS:
Wide variation in the use of PIMs is associated with hospital and physician characteristics. Care may be improved by minimizing this nonβpatientβcentered variation. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2008;3:91β102. Β© 2008 Society of Hospital Medicine.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES