Potential economies of scale at the university of Bradford
β Scribed by John Dunworth; Anthony Bottomley
- Book ID
- 104637156
- Publisher
- Springer
- Year
- 1973
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 229 KB
- Volume
- 2
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0018-1560
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
This paper demonstrates that substantial economies may be expected in per-student costs at the University of Bradford as the number of undergraduates increases. Further details may be obtained from the authors.
Components of Cost per Student
Output-budgeting techniques have been used to distribute the total costs of university operation to the various outputs produced -first degree students by discipline, postgraduates and research. As well as current expenditure, these costs include the imputed annual rental of the university's buildings.
Attribution of joint-costs proved extremely complicated and involved detailed studies of the timetabled use of classrooms and laboratories for the several courses, and a study of the distribution of academic staff time between various activities conducted by a "diary" method.
As expected, laboratory-based courses in science and engineering were considerably more expensive than classroom-based courses in social sciences. The cost of educating an undergraduate to first degree level in science or engineering ranged from s in the lowest-cost discipline to s in the highest, as against s to s in different social science disciplines.
What was surprising was that capital and maintenance costs constituted a high proportion of total cost per student. They varied between 27 and 49 percent, depending upon the course involved. Teaching costs (academic and technical staff costs, and materials) were between 22 and 53 percent of the total. The residue comprised administrative, library and miscellaneous costs.
Economies of Scale in Academic Staff Costs
Detailed studies were made of the teaching structure of nine undergraduate courses in terms of:
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
This paper presents measurements of the rates of return obtained from investment in university education and the changes in these rates which might be expected with expansion. The social internal rate of return varies between 5 and 11% on different undergraduate courses at the University of Bradford
article in the preceding journal issue raises a number of points of detail and one major question of principle. To take the detailed points first, Verry argues that because teaching and research are produced in joint supply, it is possible only to compare the total costs of higher education with its