✦ LIBER ✦

Postoperative Interview Doubles as Quality Assurance Evaluation

✍ Scribed by Jacqueline P Gary

Book ID: 116997360
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1984
Tongue: English
Weight: 361 KB
Volume: 39
Category: Article
ISSN: 0001-2092
DOI: 10.1016/s0001-2092(07)62083-3

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Evaluation of 100% rapid rescreening of

Evaluation of 100% rapid rescreening of negative cervical smears as a quality assurance measure

✍ E. J. C. Manrique; R. G. Amaral; N. L. A. Souza; S. B. N. Tavares; Z. B. P. Albu 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 60 KB

Evaluation of the 10% rescreen of negati

Evaluation of the 10% rescreen of negative gynecologic smears as a quality assurance measure

✍ Sana O. Tabbara; Mary K. Sidawy 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 335 KB 👁 2 views

The CLIA '88 regulations require the laboratory to review at least ## 10% of the gynecologic cases interpreted as negative that are examined by each cytotechnologist. The review must include negative cases selected at random and from patients identiJed as a high risk group. To evaluate the validity

Evaluation of an electronic portal imagi

Evaluation of an electronic portal imaging device (target view, ge) as a quality assurance tool

✍ Piotr Milecki; Sergiusz Nawrocki; Julian Malicki; Grażyna Stryczyńska 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 Wielkopolskie Centrum Onkologii 🌐 Polish ⚖ 98 KB

Evaluation of CIRS string Doppler phanto

Evaluation of CIRS string Doppler phantom as a test tool for use in a Doppler Ultrasound Quality Assurance program

✍ Jacinta Browne; Sean Cournane; Andrew Fagan 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Elsevier 🌐 English ⚖ 36 KB