𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Positive surgical margins and ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence predict disease-specific survival after breast-conserving therapy

✍ Scribed by Funda Meric; Nadeem Q. Mirza; Georges Vlastos; Thomas A. Buchholz; Henry M. Kuerer; Gildy V. Babiera; S. Eva Singletary; Merrick I. Ross; Frederick C. Ames; Barry W. Feig; Savitri Krishnamurthy; George H. Perkins; Marsha D. McNeese; Eric A. Strom; Vicente Valero; Kelly K. Hunt


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2003
Tongue
English
Weight
106 KB
Volume
97
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

BACKGROUND

The current study identified determinants of systemic recurrence and disease‐specific survival (DSS) in patients with early‐stage breast carcinoma treated with breast‐conserving surgery and radiation therapy (breast‐conserving therapy, or BCT).

METHODS

The study population consisted of 1,043 consecutive women with Stages I or II breast carcinoma who underwent BCT between 1970 and 1994. Clinical and pathologic characteristics evaluated included age, tumor size, tumor grade, estrogen and progesterone receptor status, surgical margins, axillary lymph node involvement, and use of adjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

At a median follow‐up time of 8.4 years, 127 patients (12%) had developed an ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), and 184 patients (18%) had developed a systemic recurrence. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, tumor size greater than 2 cm, positive lymph nodes, lack of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy, and positive margins (odds ratio [OR], 3.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1‐12.3; P = 0.034) were predictors of systemic recurrence. When IBTR was added into the model, adjuvant therapy and surgical margins were not independent predictors; however, IBTR was an independent predictor of systemic recurrence (IBTR vs. no IBTR; OR, 6.2; 95% CI, 3.1‐12.3; P < 0.001). The 10 year DSS rate after BCT was 87%. On multivariate Cox proportional hazards model analysis, the following factors were independent predictors of poor DSS: tumor size greater than 2 cm (vs. ≤ 2 cm; relative risk [RR], 2.3; 95% CI, 1.2‐4.3; P = 0.010), negative progesterone receptor status (vs. positive; RR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.4‐5.1; P = 0.003), positive margins (vs. negative; RR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.4‐11.5; P = 0.011), and IBTR (vs. no IBTR; RR, 5.5; 95% CI, 2.8‐11.0; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Positive surgical margins and IBTR are predictors of systemic recurrence and disease‐specific survival after BCT. Aggressive local therapy is necessary to ensure adequate surgical margins and to minimize IBTR. Cancer 2003;97:926–33. © 2003 American Cancer Society.

DOI 10.1002/cncr.11222


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Positive surgical margins and ipsilatera
✍ Richard A. Evans 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 57 KB 👁 1 views

M eric et al. 1 recently concluded that currently available data are not sufficient to determine conclusively whether distant metastases are caused by the development of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). 1 The authors of at least four randomized, prospective trials do not agree. [2][3][4][

Effect of margins on ipsilateral breast
✍ Carson Leong; John Boyages; Upali W. Jayasinghe; Michael Bilous; Owen Ung; Boon 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 111 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND Breast conservative surgery (CS) with radiotherapy (RT) is the most commonly used treatment for early‐stage breast carcinoma. However, there is controversy regarding the importance of the pathologic margin status on the risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR).

Classifying local disease recurrences af
✍ Eugene Huang; Thomas A. Buchholz; Funda Meric; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Nadeem Q. 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 331 KB

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND To distinguish true local recurrences (TR) from new primary tumors (NP) and to assess whether this distinction has prognostic value in patients who develop ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences (IBTR) after breast‐conserving surgery and radiotherapy. ## METHODS Between 1