๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Positive and negative adjustment and social support of sexual assault survivors

โœ Scribed by Susan E. Borja; Jennifer L. Callahan; Patricia J. Long


Publisher
Springer
Year
2006
Tongue
English
Weight
122 KB
Volume
19
Category
Article
ISSN
0894-9867

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Abstract

The roles of positive (i.e., growth) and negative (i.e., posttraumatic stress symptoms and general symptomatology) adjustment following adult sexual assault experience(s) were examined using a standardized definition of abuse. These reactions were explored in association with positive and negative support from formal and informal providers. Finally, using standardized measures, the collective impact of positive and negative support, formal and informal support were investigated in predicting positive and negative psychological adjustment. Both forms of informal support were found to be associated with positive outcomes. Only negative informal support was associated with posttraumatic stress symptoms. First responders should consider whether support resources are appropriate to victims' needs.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Social support and risk of sexual assaul
โœ Gillian E. Mason; Sarah Ullman; Susan E. Long; LaDonna Long; Laura Starzynski ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 130 KB

## Abstract Limited research on revictimization has examined the role of social support, which is known to affect sexual assault survivors' psychological recovery. Measuring social support also provides a more ecological approach to understanding revictimization, as it assesses the possible role of

Social skills and psychological adjustme
โœ Wendy Levin Newby; Ronald T. Brown; Teresa M. Pawletko; Stuart H. Gold; J. Kenne ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 96 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

Social skills and psychological adjustment for survivors of childhood cancer were investigated. Cancer survivors included 42 children and adolescents ranging in age at evaluation from 6 to 18 years with a mean age of 13.1 years. Measures included teacher and parent ratings of social skills and adjus