Population differences in von Willebrand factor levels affect the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease in African-American women

✍ Scribed by Connie H. Miller; Anne Dilley; Lisa Richardson; W. Craig Hooper; Bruce L. Evatt

• Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
• Year: 2001
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 67 KB
• Volume: 67
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 0361-8609
• DOI: 10.1002/ajh.1090

✦ Synopsis

Abstract

Diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (vWD) is based on a panel of laboratory tests that measure the amount and function of von Willebrand factor (vWF). In population studies, vWF is higher in African Americans than Caucasians. Bleeding time, factor VIII activity (FVIII), vWF antigen (vWF:Ag), “vWF activity” ELISA (vWF:Act), ristocetin cofactor (vWF:RCof), and ristocetin‐induced platelet aggregation (RIPA) were measured on 123 women with menorrhagia and 123 randomly selected control women; 70 cases and 76 controls were African American. Among controls, African Americans had significantly higher levels of vWF:Ag (mean 120 vs. 102 U/dl, P = 0.017). Among all subjects, African Americans had higher levels of vWF:Ag (mean 123 vs. 103, P = 0.001), vWF:Act (mean 101 vs. 89, P = 0.006), and FVIII (mean 118 vs. 104, P = 0.008). VWF:RCof did not differ between races (93 vs. 94 U/dl). RIPA was reduced in African Americans (P < 0.0001). In both races, women with type O blood differed significantly from those with other ABO types in vWF:Ag, vWF:Act, FVIII, and vWF:RCof. Based on criteria of two or more tests below race‐ and ABO‐specific reference ranges, 6.5% of menorrhagia cases and 0.8% of controls were classified as having vWD, or its phenocopy. Among Caucasians, no controls and 7 cases (15.6%) were classified as affected, and in African Americans, 1 control (1.3%) and 1 case (1.4%) were so classified. Racial differences in vWF further complicate the issues surrounding diagnosis of vWD. The finding of increased vWF:Ag not accompanied by increased vWF:RCof has implications for understanding the structure‐function relationships of vWF. Am. J. Hematol. 67:125–129, 2001. Published 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.