✦ LIBER ✦

Popper and computer induction

✍ Scribed by Donald A. Gillies

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 2001
Tongue: English
Weight: 51 KB
Volume: 23
Category: Article
ISSN: 0265-9247
DOI: 10.1002/bies.1123

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Popper, induction and falsification

✍ Gary Jones; Clifton Perry 📂 Article 📅 1982 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 417 KB

More on popper and biology: the utility

More on popper and biology: the utility of induction

✍ Jonathan Gallant 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 34 KB 👁 2 views

## Sir, Drs. Smith and Mogie (BioEssays 22.3) criticise Robin Holliday for ``Taking an inductionist stance'', and later in their letter consider an argument in favour of induction in order to dismiss it. But surely it is a bit odd to dismiss induction. Without it we would be groping in total darkn

Popper and reality

✍ Mendel Sachs 📂 Article 📅 1976 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 849 KB

Computational inductive definability

✍ Dexter Kozen 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 217 KB

Popper

✍ Lewis Wolpert 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 22 KB

Sir, Robin Holliday's criticism of Popper is welcome. Philosophers of science this century have contributed nothing that helps us understand the scientific process and why it is so successful. Scientists regard their activity with a puzzled detachment. The oft quoted counter-example is Karl Popper a