<span>Political Conversations in Ciceronian Rome</span><span> offers for the first time a perspective of Roman politics through the proxy of conversations and meetings. In Rome oral was the default mode of communication in politics: oratory before the people in assemblies, addresses and discussions
Political Conversations in Late Republican Rome
✍ Scribed by Cristina Rosillo-López
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Year
- 2022
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 305
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Political Conversations in Ciceronian Rome offers for the first time a perspective of Roman politics through the proxy of conversations and meetings. In Rome oral was the default mode of communication in politics: oratory before the people in assemblies, addresses and discussions in the Senate, speeches in the law courts, rumours, and public opinion. We are familiar with the notion that the Roman political world of the Late Republic included lofty speeches and sessions of the Senate, but an important aspect of Late-Republican politics revolved around senators talking among themselves, chatting off in the corner. Only when they could not reach each other in person, Roman senators and their peers resorted to letters.
This book intends to analyse political conversations and illuminate the oral dimension of Roman politics. It posits that the study of politics should not be restricted to the senatorial group, but that other persons should be considered as important political actors with their own agency (albeit in different degrees), such as freedmen and elite women. It argues that Roman senators and their entourages met in person to have conversations in which they discussed politics, circulated political information and negotiated strategies; this extra-institutional sphere had a relevant impact both on politics and institutions as well as determined how the Roman Republic functioned.
✦ Table of Contents
Cover
Political Conversations in Late Republican Rome
Copyright
Dedication
Acknowledgements
Contents
List of Figures and Tables
Introduction
Why are conversations important?
Senatorial relationships and Roman politics
Outline of the book
1: A wider definition of politics and political participation
1.1 Extra-institutional politics
1.2 What is politics and political participation?
2: Sources for political conversations in Late Republican Rome
2.1 Why the letters of Cicero?
2.2 Why do later sources display a different perspective?
3: Face-to-face meetings
3.1 Le métier du sénateur romain: the importance of being present in Rome (or nearby)
3.2 The importance of meeting in person
3.2.1 The ‘circulatory system’
3.2.2 The limitations of letters
3.2.3 Face-to-face meetings as problem-solving: the encounters of 49
3.2.4 Physical presence and negotiation
3.2.5 Caesar as ruler and face-to-face meetings
3.3 The myth of senatorial meetings: the ‘conference of Luca’
3.3.1 The ‘standard version’ of the ‘Conference of Luca’
3.3.2 The logistics of senatorial ‘conferences’
3.3.3 Caesar’s face-to-face politics during his proconsulship in Gaul
3.3.4 The ‘Conference of Luca’ as a litmus test for being connected or disconnected
3.4 Conclusion
Appendix: Informal meetings January–May 49
4: How to have conversations
4.1 The early socialization of the Roman elite
4.2 The social expectations governing conversation
4.2.1 Learning how to have a conversation
4.2.2 Social expectations: dynamics of conversations
4.2.3 Conversations and disagreement
4.2.4 Conversations and placating anger
4.3 Occasions for conversation
4.3.1 Dinners
4.3.2 Senaculum
4.3.3 Consilia and meetings
4.4 Conclusions
5: Dynamics of conversations
5.1 Methodological issues
5.2 Conversations, insider information, speculations, and predictions
5.3 Non-verbal information: gestures, feelings, and impressions
5.4 Conversations transmitted in direct speech: case studies
5.4.1 Cicero and Caesar (28 March 49)
5.4.2 Curio and Cicero (14 April 49)
5.4.3 The so-called consilium of June 44 (group conversation)
5.5 A non-Ciceronian perspective on conversation
5.6 Conclusions
6: Oral circulation of information
6.1 Circulation of information
6.1.1 What kind of information was sought?
6.1.2 Requesting and fishing for information
6.1.3 The connection and disconnection of the flow of information
6.2 Control of information
6.2.1 Could the circulation of information be restricted?
6.2.2 When things got out of control: leaked conversations
6.3 Conclusions
7: The role of non-senatorial actors in conversations and meetings
7.1 How to identify and refer to these actors?
7.2 Non-senatorial actors: analysis
7.2.1 Freedmen
7.2.2 Elite women
7.2.3 Non-elite women
7.3 The role of mandata
7.3.1 Mandata in private law and on official missions
7.3.2 Mandata in extra-institutional politics
7.4 Conclusions
8: The Senate from an extra-institutional point of view
8.1 Preparatory conversations
8.2 How to draft and negotiate a law proposal
8.3 Was there an agenda in the Roman Senate?
8.4 Looking for political support
8.4.1 A specific issue: Cicero’s supplicatio
8.4.2 Bringing someone over from the other side: Hirtius in 44
8.4.3 The Buthrotum affair
8.5 The presence of non-senatorial actors: the special case of Atticus
8.6 Conclusion: What happened when senators could not meet and talk beforehand?
9: Conclusions
Appendix: Prosopography of non-senatorial actors
A.1 Young men¹
A.2 Equites
A.3 Freedmen
A.4 Women
A.5 People of unknown status
Bibliography
Index of People
Subject Index
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
<span>The civil wars of the first century BCE disrupted Roman society, which in turn was a major cause of the destabilisation of the political system. While this has of course long been recognised, the cultural dimension of the disintegration of the res publica demands equal attention. The present v
Architecture and Politics in Republican Rome is the first book to explore the intersection between Roman Republican building practices and politics (c.509–44 BCE). At the start of the period, architectural commissions were carefully controlled by the political system; by the end, buildings were so w
"What does it mean to be a leader? This collection of seventeen studies breaks new ground in our understanding of leadership in ancient Rome by re-evaluating the difference between those who began a political action and those who followed or reacted. In a significant change of approach, this volume
"What does it mean to be a leader? This collection of seventeen studies breaks new ground in our understanding of leadership in ancient Rome by re-evaluating the difference between those who began a political action and those who followed or reacted. In a significant change of approach, this volume