<DIV>In this book a distinguished philosopher offers a comprehensive interpretation of Platoβs most controversial dialogue. Treating the <I>Republic </I>as a unity and focusing on the dramatic form as the presentation of the argument, Stanley Rosen challenges earlier analyses of the <I>Republic </I>
Plato's Republic: A Study
β Scribed by Stanley Rosen
- Year
- 2005
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 432
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
In this book a distinguished philosopher offers a comprehensive interpretation of Platoβs most controversial dialogue. Treating the Republic as a unity and focusing on the dramatic form as the presentation of the argument, Stanley Rosen challenges earlier analyses of the Republic (including the ironic reading of Leo Strauss and his disciples) and argues that the key to understanding the dialogue is to grasp the authorβs intention in composing it, in particular whether Plato believed that the city constructed in the Republic is possible and desirable.Rosen demonstrates that the fundamental principles underlying the just city are theoretically attractive but that the attempt to enact them in practice leads to conceptual incoherence and political disaster. The Republic, says Rosen, is a vivid illustration of the irreconcilability of philosophy and political practice.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
<DIV>In this book a distinguished philosopher offers a comprehensive interpretation of PlatoΠ²Πβ’s most controversial dialogue. Treating the <I>Republic </I>as a unity and focusing on the dramatic form as the presentation of the argument, Stanley Rosen challenges earlier analyses of the <I>Republic </
<div>In this book a distinguished philosopher offers a comprehensive interpretation of Platoβs most controversial dialogue. Treating the <i>Republic </i>as a unity and focusing on the dramatic form as the presentation of the argument, Stanley Rosen challenges earlier analyses of the <i>Republic </i>
<p>A new interpretation of Plato's Republic. Craig investigates why this dialogue, ostensibly about justice, offers Plato's fullest account of philosophy and philosophers, and why it is preoccupied with war.</p>
This new examination of the Republic begins with questions ignored by most students of this famous and much-studied dialogue. Why is Plato's most extensive portrait of philosophy pervaded with the language and imagery of war? Why is a discussion supposedly about justice almost entirely about how to