The volume contains a collection of papers presented at the International Symposium, which took place in Hvar, Croatia, in 2006. In recent years there has been an upsurge of interest in the study of Plato, Platonism and Neoplatonism. Taking the position that it is of vital importance to establish an
Platonism and Forms of Intelligence
β Scribed by John Dillon (editor); Marie-Elise Zovko (editor)
- Publisher
- Akademie Verlag
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- German
- Leaves
- 352
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
The volume contains a collection of papers presented at the International Symposium, which took place in Hvar, Croatia, in 2006. In recent years there has been an upsurge of interest in the study of Plato, Platonism and Neoplatonism. Taking the position that it is of vital importance to establish an ongoing dialogue among scientists, artists, academics, theologians and philosophers concerning pressing issues of common interest to humankind, this collection of papers endeavours to bridge the gap between contemporary research in Platonist philosophy and other fields where insights gained from the study of Plato and Platonist philosophy can be of consequence and benefit. Authors: Werner Beierwaltes, Luc Brisson, Amber Carpenter, John Dillon, Jonathan Doner, Franco Ferrari, Francesco Fronterotta, F.A.J. de Haas, Aaron Hughes, Byron Kaldis, Daniel Kolak, Thomas Leinkauf, Dionysis Mentzeniotis, Jean-Marc Narbonne, Giannis Stamatellos, Vladimir Stoupel, Patrick Quinn, Jure Zovko and Marie-Γlize Zovko
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
<P>Was Plato a Platonist? While ancient disciples of Plato would have answered this question in the affirmative, modern scholars have generally denied that Platoβs own philosophy was in substantial agreement with that of the Platonists of succeeding centuries. In <I>From Plato to Platonism</I>, Lloy
<p>Was Plato a Platonist? While ancient disciples of Plato would have answered this question in the affirmative, modern scholars have generally denied that Platoβs own philosophy was in substantial agreement with that of the Platonists of succeeding centuries. In <i>From Plato to Platonism</i>, Lloy