𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

PIH15 ADJUSTING FORTRIAL QUALITY IN A META-ANALYSIS

✍ Scribed by DC Zammit; JW Hay; DR Globe; CA Sugar; WJ Gauderman

Book ID
119596193
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2007
Tongue
English
Weight
71 KB
Volume
10
Category
Article
ISSN
1098-3015

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Detecting and adjusting for small-study
Detecting and adjusting for small-study effects in meta-analysis
✍ Gerta RΓΌcker; James R. Carpenter; Guido Schwarzer πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2011 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 362 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Abstract Publication bias and related types of small‐study effects threaten the validity of systematic reviews. The existence of small‐study effects has been demonstrated in empirical studies. Small‐study effects are graphically diagnosed by inspection of the funnel plot. Though observed funnel

Modelling study quality in meta-analysis
Modelling study quality in meta-analysis
✍ David Tritchler πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 105 KB

When summarizing studies in a meta-analysis, the methodological quality of the studies can vary widely. This variation is often described by assigning quality scores to studies. This paper presents a probability model for the e!ect of quality on a summary e!ect measure. The model motivates criteria