## Abstract ## Objective The Disease Activity Score (DAS) is widely used in clinical trials. A DAS of 5.1 defines the level of severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and is the criterion for the initiation of anti–tumor necrosis factor therapy in the UK and The Netherlands. In North America, similar rul
Physician preference motivates the use of anti–tumor necrosis factor therapy independent of clinical disease activity
✍ Scribed by Jeffrey R. Curtis; Lang Chen; Leslie R. Harrold; Pongthorn Narongroeknawin; George Reed; Daniel H. Solomon
- Publisher
- Wiley (John Wiley & Sons)
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 82 KB
- Volume
- 62
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 2151-464X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Objective
Physician preference has previously been shown to be an important determinant of prescription patterns, independent of patient‐specific factors. We evaluated whether physician preference was important in the decision to select anti–tumor necrosis factor (anti‐TNF) therapy rather than nonbiologic disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) among rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients initiating a new RA medication.
Methods
Using data from the Consortium of Rheumatology Researchers of North America, we identified RA patients who had never taken biologics initiating either anti‐TNF therapy or a DMARD in 2001–2008. Physician preference for the use of anti‐TNF agents was calculated using data from the preceding calendar year for each physician's other RA patients. Multivariable logistic regression with generalized estimating equations accounted for clustering of patients within the physician practice and evaluated the relationship between physician preference and receipt of anti‐TNF therapy, controlling for patient‐related factors and disease activity using the Clinical Disease Activity Index.
Results
We identified 1,532 RA patients initiating anti‐TNF therapy or a DMARD. In models adjusting for tender and swollen joint counts and global disease activity, physician preference for the use of anti‐TNF therapy was an independent predictor of receipt of these agents. Patients of physicians in the highest and middle tertiles of physician preference had a 2.50 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.76–3.56) and 1.70 (95% CI 1.22–2.39) greater likelihood of receiving anti‐TNF medications, respectively.
Conclusion
Physician preference is an important determinant of patients' receipt of anti‐TNF therapy and may be useful to examine in future studies of RA treatment patterns, costs, and medication safety.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract ## Objective Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are clinically and pathologically linked. Anti–tumor necrosis factor (anti‐TNF) agents are efficacious in treating AS, but not all are equally effective in treating IBD (Crohn's disease [CD] and ulcerative co