𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Physician preference motivates the use of anti–tumor necrosis factor therapy independent of clinical disease activity

✍ Scribed by Jeffrey R. Curtis; Lang Chen; Leslie R. Harrold; Pongthorn Narongroeknawin; George Reed; Daniel H. Solomon


Publisher
Wiley (John Wiley & Sons)
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
82 KB
Volume
62
Category
Article
ISSN
2151-464X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Objective

Physician preference has previously been shown to be an important determinant of prescription patterns, independent of patient‐specific factors. We evaluated whether physician preference was important in the decision to select anti–tumor necrosis factor (anti‐TNF) therapy rather than nonbiologic disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) among rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients initiating a new RA medication.

Methods

Using data from the Consortium of Rheumatology Researchers of North America, we identified RA patients who had never taken biologics initiating either anti‐TNF therapy or a DMARD in 2001–2008. Physician preference for the use of anti‐TNF agents was calculated using data from the preceding calendar year for each physician's other RA patients. Multivariable logistic regression with generalized estimating equations accounted for clustering of patients within the physician practice and evaluated the relationship between physician preference and receipt of anti‐TNF therapy, controlling for patient‐related factors and disease activity using the Clinical Disease Activity Index.

Results

We identified 1,532 RA patients initiating anti‐TNF therapy or a DMARD. In models adjusting for tender and swollen joint counts and global disease activity, physician preference for the use of anti‐TNF therapy was an independent predictor of receipt of these agents. Patients of physicians in the highest and middle tertiles of physician preference had a 2.50 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.76–3.56) and 1.70 (95% CI 1.22–2.39) greater likelihood of receiving anti‐TNF medications, respectively.

Conclusion

Physician preference is an important determinant of patients' receipt of anti‐TNF therapy and may be useful to examine in future studies of RA treatment patterns, costs, and medication safety.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


The Disease Activity Score is not suitab
✍ Frederick Wolfe; Kaleb Michaud; Theodore Pincus; Daniel Furst; Edward Keystone 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 218 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract ## Objective The Disease Activity Score (DAS) is widely used in clinical trials. A DAS of 5.1 defines the level of severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and is the criterion for the initiation of anti–tumor necrosis factor therapy in the UK and The Netherlands. In North America, similar rul

Differences in the incidence of flares o
✍ Braun, J. ;Baraliakos, X. ;Listing, J. ;Davis, J. ;van der Heijde, D. ;Haibel, H 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 89 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract ## Objective Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are clinically and pathologically linked. Anti–tumor necrosis factor (anti‐TNF) agents are efficacious in treating AS, but not all are equally effective in treating IBD (Crohn's disease [CD] and ulcerative co