Phylogenetic relationships within the Acanthocephala have remained unresolved. Past systematic efforts have focused on creating classifications with little consideration of phylogenetic methods. The Acanthocephala are currently divided into three major taxonomic groups: Archiacanthocephala, Palaeaca
Phylogenetic Relationships of Platyhelminthes Based on 18S Ribosomal Gene Sequences
✍ Scribed by Andrés Campos; Michael P. Cummings; José Luis Reyes; Juan Pedro Laclette
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1998
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 165 KB
- Volume
- 10
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1055-7903
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Nucleotide sequences of 18S ribosomal RNA from 71 species of Platyhelminthes, the flatworms, were analyzed using maximum likelihood, and the resulting phylogenetic trees were compared with previous phylogenetic hypotheses. Analyses including 15 outgroup species belonging to eight other phyla show that Platyhelminthes are monophyletic with the exception of a sequence putatively from Acoela sp., Lecithoepitheliata, Polycladida, Tricladida, Trematoda (Aspidobothrii + Digenea), Monogenea, and Cestoda (Gyrocotylidea + Amphilinidea + Eucestoda) are monophyletic groups. Catenulids form the sister group to the rest of platyhelminths, whereas a complex clade formed by Acoela, Tricladida, "Dalyellioida", and perhaps "Typhloplanoida" is sister to Neodermata. "Typhloplanoida" does not appear to be monophyletic; Fecampiida does not appear to belong within "Dalyellioida," nor Kalyptorhynchia within "Typhloplanoida." Trematoda is the sister group to the rest of Neodermata, and Monogenea is sister group to Cestoda. Within Trematoda, Aspidobothrii is the sister group of Digenea and Heronimidae is the most basal family in Digenea. Our trees support the hypothesis that parasitism evolved at least twice in Platyhelminthes, once in the ancestor to Neodermata and again in the ancestor of Fecampiida, independently to the ancestor of putatively parasitic "Dalyellioida."
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Taxonomic relationships within the corals and anemones (Phylum Cnidaria: Class Anthozoa) are based upon few morphological characters. The significance of any given character is debatable, and there is little fossil record available for deriving evolutionary relationships. We analyzed complete 18S ri
Tubificids are aquatic clitellate worms, but recent analyses of morphological characters suggested that this family, as currently recognized, is paraphyletic. Sequences of the 18S rDNA gene of 40 protostome worm species (including 13 representatives of the Tubificidae) and 2 mollusc species were cla
The phylogenetic relationships of xenodontine snakes are inferred from sequence analyses of portions of two mitochondrial genes (12S and 16S ribosomal RNA) in 85 species. Although support values for most of the basal nodes are low, the general pattern of cladogenesis observed is congruent with many
Published molecular phylogenetic studies of elapid snakes agree that the marine and Australo-Melanesian forms are collectively monophyletic. Recent studies, however, disagree on the relationships of the African, American, and Asian forms. To resolve the relationships of the African, American, and As