๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Phylogenetic Relationships among Tick Subfamilies (Ixodida: Ixodidae: Argasidae) Based on the 18S Nuclear rDNA Gene

โœ Scribed by William C. Black IV; J.S.H. Klompen; James E. Keirans


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1997
Tongue
English
Weight
533 KB
Volume
7
Category
Article
ISSN
1055-7903

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Phylogenetic relationships among tick subfamilies have been estimated using morphological and molecular characters. However, the phylogeny based on a portion of the 16S mitochondrial rDNA gene differed from the morphologically based phylogeny in a number of important respects. The entire 18S rDNA gene was examined in 18 taxa from all tick subfamilies to test the 16S rDNA based phylogeny. The 18S phylogeny supports the earlier 16S based phylogeny in placing members of Hyalomminae on a common branch with members of the Rhipicephalinae and in indicating long branch lengths among soft tick taxa. However, unlike the 16S phylogeny, Amblyomminae was monophyletic and members of Haemaphysalinae did not arise within Amblyomminae. Argasinae formed a monophyletic group within Argasidae and was not a sister taxon of the hard ticks. In most respects, the phylogeny based on the 18S rDNA gene resembles the morphologically based phylogeny.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Phylogenetic Relationships within the Cl
โœ Ewann A. Berntson; Scott C. France; Lauren S. Mullineaux ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 210 KB

Taxonomic relationships within the corals and anemones (Phylum Cnidaria: Class Anthozoa) are based upon few morphological characters. The significance of any given character is debatable, and there is little fossil record available for deriving evolutionary relationships. We analyzed complete 18S ri