𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Phenotypic differences among morphologically similar small-cell carcinomas detected with a panel of monoclonal antibodies and indirect immunofluorescence and flow cytometry

✍ Scribed by Aurelia M. C. Koros; Erik A. Bey; Stephanie L. Conley; Bernard W. Rogers


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1994
Tongue
French
Weight
454 KB
Volume
57
Category
Article
ISSN
0020-7136

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Indirect immunofluorescence and flow cytometry were used to determine reactivity of a panel of 75 monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) and controls (provided by the Third International IASLC Workshop on Lung Tumor and Differentiation Antigens) with 3 morphologically similar prototype continuous-culture small-cell-carcinoma cell lines (SCC) (NCLH69, NCI-H 146, and NCI-H5 10). All cell lines had some reactivity with some of the MAbs. There is, however, differential expression of antigens amongst the prototype cell lines, which may provide a useful method for phenotyping and sub-classifying SCC. The reactivity of the 3 cell lines was greatest with MAbs in Clusters I, I c, 2,4, 6, and 9, and least with MAbs in clusters W7,8, 13, 14, and W 15, with few exceptions. Although morphologically similar, each of the SCC cell lines has a unique pattern of reactivity with the workshop MAbs. For example, although a control MAb, CD56 (NKHI), which identifies an epitope on NCAM (neural cell adhesion molecule) common among many SCC lines, stained more than 90% of cells in each of the prototype cell lines, one MAb of the current panel, SEN7, which also identifies a CD56 epitope on I5 SCC lines did not react as strongly with H-146 and H-510 as with H-69. If appropriately reactive MAbs can be identified for individual patients' tumors, they can be coupled to suitable radioisotopes or toxins for individualized patient treatment.