## Abstract ## BACKGROUND The current study was conducted to evaluate the antitumor activity and toxicity of gemcitabine in patients with advanced sarcoma. ## METHODS Twentyβfive patients with advanced sarcomas, who previously were untreated for metastatic disease, were treated on an Eastern Coo
Phase II trial of gemcitabine in advanced sarcomas
β Scribed by Scott Okuno; John Edmonson; Michelle Mahoney; Jan C. Buckner; Stephen Frytak; Evanthia Galanis
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2002
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 63 KB
- Volume
- 94
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0008-543X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Care for patients with advanced sarcomas is mainly palliative. Gemcitabine, a nucleoside antimetabolite, is an analog of deoxycytidine that has shown antitumor activity in several tumors. The aim of the current study was to determine the clinical activity of gemcitabine in patients with sarcomas.
METHODS
The authors evaluated gemcitabine in patients with histologically confirmed sarcomas; one prior exposure to chemotherapy treatment was allowed. Prior radiation was allowed if given to nonβindicator lesions. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1250 mg/m^2^ intravenously over 30 minutes, every week Γ three, cycles repeated q28 days.
RESULTS
Twenty nine of 30 patients were evaluable; one patient refused to initiate study treatment. The mean age was 50 years (range, 22β81 years); 59% were male, and 35% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 (vs. 1 or 2). Patients were histologically classified as leiomyosarcoma (seven gastrointestinal, four retroperitoneal, two inferior vena caval, three of the extremity, and two uterine), synovial (two patients), malignant fibrous histiocytoma (two patients), fibrosarcoma (one patient), osteosarcoma (two patients), liposarcoma (one patient), hemangiosarcoma (one patient), or giant cell (one patient). Patients received an average of two cycles (range, one to eight). Eighty three percent of patients discontinued treatment due to progression and 14% due to toxicity/refusal. Hematologic toxicities β₯ Grade 3 were seen in 32% of patients and consisted of leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. Anorexia (Grade 1/2 in 6 patients, Grade 3 in 1 patient), nausea (Grade 1/2 in 7 patients, Grade 3 in 1 patient), and lethargy (Grade 1/2 in 19 patients) were the most frequently observed nonhematologic toxicities. One patient experienced Grade 3 edema and muscle infarction. A different patient experienced unexplained Grade 3 chest pain. One partial response was observed in a uterine leiomyosarcoma patient lasting at least three months. Overall response rate was 3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0β15). Median time βto progression was 2.1 months (95% CI: 1.8β3.0).
CONCLUSIONS
The current gemcitabine regimen demonstrated acceptable levels of toxicity, but it failed to produce the number of responses needed to justify expansion of the current study. This regimen is not recommended for advanced sarcomas. Cancer 2002;94:3225β9. Β© 2002 American Cancer Society.
DOI 10.1002/cncr.10602
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract ## BACKGROUND There is no effective systemic therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. A recent trial reported a moderate antitumor activity for gemcitabine among Asian patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. This led to our examination of the efficacy and tolerabili
## Abstract ## BACKGROUND. Singleβagent gemcitabine and vinorelbine have activity in treatment of patients with softβtissue sarcomas. The combination of gemcitabine plus vinorelbine has activity against several forms of metastatic carcinoma with acceptable toxicity. This study evaluated the effica
## Abstract ## BACKGROUND. A phase 2 trial of gemcitabine and capecitabine (GemCap) in patients with advanced biliary cancer led to an objective response in approximately 30% of patients and a median survival of 14 months. In the current study, the authors report further efficacy data of a larger