𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Phase II trial of carboplatin, gemcitabine, and capecitabine in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site

✍ Scribed by Bryan J. Schneider; Basil El-Rayes; Jeffery H. Muler; Philip A. Philip; Gregory P. Kalemkerian; Kent A. Griffith; Mark M. Zalupski


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2007
Tongue
English
Weight
92 KB
Volume
110
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

BACKGROUND.

The purposes of this study were to evaluate efficacy and toxicity of the combination of carboplatin, gemcitabine, and capecitabine in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site (CUP).

METHODS.

Patients with CUP received carboplatin AUC 5 mg/mL a minute intravenously Day 1, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m^2^ intravenously Days 1 and 8, and capecitabine 1600 mg/m^2^ orally in divided doses, Days 1–14 of a 21‐day cycle for up to 8 cycles. The primary endpoint of the study was objective response rate by intent‐to‐treat analysis.

RESULTS.

Thirty‐three patients were treated (median age, 58 years; men:women ratio, 19:14). Most patients had a baseline performance status of 1. The objective response rate was 39.4% (95% CI, 22.9%–57.9%) in all patients, 36.4% in 22 patients with well to moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, and 40.0% in 20 patients with liver metastases. Median progression‐free survival time was 6.2 months (95% CI, 5.4%–8.0%), and median survival time was 7.6 months (95% CI, 6.3–14.1). One and 2‐year survival rates were 35.6% and 14.2%, respectively. The most frequent grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia (67%), thrombocytopenia (48%), and anemia (33%).

CONCLUSIONS.

The combination of carboplatin, gemcitabine, and capecitabine is active in CUP, especially in patients with liver metastases. This regimen may be a potential therapy for CUP patients with good performance status, particularly those with a suspected origin below the diaphragm. Cancer 2007; 110:770–5. © 2007 American Cancer Society.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


A phase II trial of gemcitabine in patie
✍ Charles S. Fuchs; Jeffrey W. Clark; David P. Ryan; Mathew H. Kulke; Haesook Kim; 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 74 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND There is no effective systemic therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. A recent trial reported a moderate antitumor activity for gemcitabine among Asian patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. This led to our examination of the efficacy and tolerabili

Gemcitabine and docetaxel as front-line
✍ Damien Pouessel; Stéphane Culine; Catherine Becht; Marc Ychou; Gilles Romieu; Mi 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 70 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND The current study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a noncisplatin‐based chemotherapy regimen combining gemcitabine and docetaxel as front‐line chemotherapy for patients with carcinoma of an unknown primary site. ## METHODS Patients were to receive

Gemcitabine and docetaxel as front-line
✍ Alberto Muñoz; José Ramón Barceló; Guillermo López-Vivanco 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 67 KB 👁 1 views

tional RCC and extensively cystic Bosniak Grade 2 or 3 disease, which may be difficult to diagnose reliably using either fine-needle or core-needle biopsy. Correlation of the results presented by Volpe et al. with the additional findings discussed in the current correspondence may be useful.