๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Phase II trial of carboplatin and etoposide in metastatic breast cancer

โœ Scribed by John Crown; Thomas Hakes; Bonnie Reichman; David Lebwohl; Theresa Gilewski; Antonella Surbone; Violante Currie; Tzy-Jyun Yao; Clifford Hudis; Andrew Seidman; Larry Norton


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1993
Tongue
English
Weight
345 KB
Volume
71
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Background:

High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic support produces high rates of response in metastatic breast cancer. to facilitate new high-dose regimens there is a need to identify active agents with toxicity limited to hematopoietic suppression. cisplatin/etoposide is a highly active regimen in metastatic breast cancer, but cisplatin dose-escalation is limited by nonhematologic toxicity. carboplatin is active in breast cancer and has marrow-dominant toxicity. demonstration of activity for the combination of carboplatin and etoposide would facilitate their inclusion in high-dose programs.

Methods:

A single treatment arm prospective phase ii study in patients with measurable or evaluable breast cancer was done.

Results:

Forty-six patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated with the combination of carboplatin and etoposide. among 19 patients without prior chemotherapy, one complete and seven partial responses were observed, for an objective response rate of 42% (95% exact confidence intervals [ci], 20-67%). one partial response was seen among 12 patients with prior chemotherapy limited to the adjuvant setting. no responses were seen among 14 patients who had received prior chemotherapy for metastatic cancer. two treatment-related deaths occurred, both attributable to sepsis. one patient returned to her community for treatment after receiving one course of protocol therapy before response assessment and could not be studied for response.

Conclusion:

The activity observed with this regimen in patients with no prior chemotherapy coupled with its potential for dose escalation suggests a possible role in high-dose programs with hematopoietic support. the inactivity of the combination in patients with prior therapy for metastatic breast cancer indicates that there is no advantage to its use in the salvage setting.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Carboplatin and etoposide in advanced co
โœ Branislav Jeremic; Ljubisa Acimovic; Ljiljana Mijatovic ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1993 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 294 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

## Background: For advanced colorectal carcinoma, 5-fluorouracil (5-fu)-leucovorin is the best therapy available. to improve results, a variety of drugs were added, including cisplatin (cddp), sometimes with controversial results. the combination of cddp and etoposide (vp-16) has shown synergistic

Methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin,
โœ Bruce J. Roth; George W. Sledge Jr; Stephen D. Williams; Steven C. Meyer; Rafat ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1991 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 490 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

Forty-six eligible patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) were treated with a combination of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (M-VAC) as first-line chemotherapy. Of 44 patients evaluable for response, 28 (64%) had an objective response, including seven (16%) who had a comp

A phase II trial of taxol in metastatic
โœ Sewa S. Legha; Sigrid Ring; Nicholas Papadopoulos; Martin Raber; Robert S. Benja ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1990 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 321 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views