𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of mycophenolate mofetil in combination with standard-dose or reduced-dose tacrolimus in liver transplant recipients

✍ Scribed by Björn Nashan; Faouzi Saliba; Francois Durand; Rafael Barcéna; Jose Ignacio Herrero; Gilles Mentha; Peter Neuhaus; Matthew Bowles; David Patch; Angel Bernardos; Jürgen Klempnauer; René Bouw; Jane Ives; Richard Mamelok; Diane McKay; Matt Truman; Paul Marotta


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
455 KB
Volume
15
Category
Article
ISSN
1527-6465

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


The pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in liver transplant recipients may change because of pharmacokinetic interactions with coadministered immunosuppressants or because changes in the enterohepatic anatomy may affect biotransformation of MMF to mycophenolic acid (MPA) and enterohepatic recirculation of MPA through the hydrolysis of mycophenolate acid glucuronide to MPA in the gut. In the latter case, the choice of formulation (oral versus intravenous) could have important clinical implications. We randomized liver transplant patients (n ϭ 60) to standard (10-15 ng/mL) or reduced (5-8 ng/mL) trough levels of tacrolimus plus intravenous MMF followed by oral MMF (1 g twice daily) with corticosteroids. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed after the last intravenous MMF dose, after the first oral MMF dose, and at selected times over 52 weeks. The efficacy and safety of the 2 regimens were also assessed. Twenty-eight and 27 patients in the tacrolimus standard-dose and reduced-dose groups, respectively, were evaluated. No significant differences between the tacrolimus standard-dose and reduced-dose groups were seen in dose-normalized MPA values of the time to the maximum plasma concentration (1.25 versus 1.28 hours), the maximum plasma concentration (15.5 Ϯ 7.93 versus 13.6 Ϯ 7.03 g/mL), or the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 hours (AUC 0-12 ; 53.0 Ϯ 20.6 versus 43.8 Ϯ 15.5 g h/mL) at week Abbreviations: AUC, area under the concentration-time curve; AUC 0-12h , area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 hours; AUC last , area under the concentration-time curve from 0 hours to the last measurable concentration; BPAR, biopsy-proven acute rejection; C max , maximum plasma concentration; C min , mean of the predose and 12-hour plasma concentrations (or trough concentration when a 12-hour sample was unavailable); IV, intravenous; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; MPA, mycophenolic acid; MPAG, mycophenolic acid glucuronide; N/A, not available; SD, standard deviation; T max , time to the maximum plasma concentration.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Evaluation of renal function in liver tr
✍ Eric M. Yoshida; Paul J. Marotta; Paul D. Greig; Norman M. Kneteman; Denis Marle 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 111 KB

Posttransplant chronic renal failure, secondary to calcineurin inhibitor agents, is emerging as a major problem in liver transplantation. We report a randomized clinical trial comparing daclizumab, delayed low-dose tacrolimus (target trough level 4-8 ng/mL, starting day 4-6), Investigational Arm (n

Long-term renal function in liver transp
✍ Svetlana Karie-Guigues; Nicolas Janus; Faouzi Saliba; Jerome Dumortier; Christop 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 152 KB 👁 1 views

The prevalence of renal insufficiency before and at 1, 12, and 60 months after liver transplantation (LTx; primary endpoint) and the changes in the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at same time points according to the immunosuppressive regimen (coprimary endpoint) were investigated. The primary outc