✦ LIBER ✦

Perturbation bounds for triangular and full rank factorizations

✍ Scribed by A. Galántai

Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2005
Tongue: English
Weight: 408 KB
Volume: 50
Category: Article
ISSN: 0898-1221
DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2005.08.008

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Rounding-error and perturbation bounds f

Rounding-error and perturbation bounds for the Cholesky and LDLT factorizations

✍ Ji-guang Sun 📂 Article 📅 1992 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 726 KB

Computable eigenvalue bounds for rank-k

Computable eigenvalue bounds for rank-k perturbations

✍ Jan H. Brandts; Ricardo Reis da Silva 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 250 KB

Improved bound for rank revealing LU fac

Improved bound for rank revealing LU factorizations

✍ Tsung-Min Hwang; Wen-Wei Lin; Daniel Pierce 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 606 KB

In many applications it is necessary to determine the rank (or numerical rank) of a matrix. Many of these situations involve matrices that are very large order or that are sparse or that may undergo some form of modification (rank-k update, row or column appended or removed). In these cases the sing

Perturbation bounds for the generalized

Perturbation bounds for the generalized QR factorization

✍ Anders Barrlund 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 872 KB

Rounding-error and perturbation bounds f

Rounding-error and perturbation bounds for the indefinite QR factorization

✍ Sanja Singer; Saša Singer 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 139 KB

Indefinite QR factorization is a generalization of the well-known QR factorization, where Q is a unitary matrix with respect to the given indefinite inner product matrix J. This factorization can be used for accurate computation of eigenvalues of the Hermitian matrix A = G \* J G, where G and J are

Bounds for Hartree-Fock perturbation the

Bounds for Hartree-Fock perturbation theory

✍ B. L. Burrows 📂 Article 📅 1973 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 345 KB

## Abstract Upper and lower bounds for the second‐order energy in both coupled and uncoupled Hartree‐Fock perturbation theories are derived. Using these bounds inequalities are derived for the error in the geometric approximation.