๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Persons and their bodies

โœ Scribed by Mrinal Miri


Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Year
1973
Tongue
English
Weight
271 KB
Volume
24
Category
Article
ISSN
0031-8116

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


I want, in this note, to point out certain difficulties involved in one of Strawson's though-experiments in his Individuals. This is to be found in Section 2 of the chapter on 'Persons'.

The thought-experiment is alleged to show the logical possibility of their being only one subject of experience, S, (as it were) having several different bodies (e.g. A, B, C). Let us suppose that S is a subject of visual experiences: "(1) Whether the eyelids of B and C are open or not is causally irrelevant to whether S sees; but S sees only when the eyelids of A are open... ( 2) Where A and B may be is, however, quite irrelevant to where S sees from, i.e. to what his possible field of vision is. This is determined by where C is .... But (3) the direction in which the heads and eyeballs of A and C are turned are quite irrelevant to what S sees. Given the station of C, then which of all the views which are possible from this position is the view seen by S, depends on the direction in which the heads and eyeballs of B are turned, wherever B may find himself.'1 Apart from the quite incredible difficulties that would be involved in spelling out his story in detail, Strawson would have to face the question that rises immediately to mind in view of his theory of persons: Where is the person, the entity which has the experiences? Presumably this entity is the same as S? One possible answer is that S is equally present in all the three bodies. But then persons would be too much like universals for Strawson's taste. 2 Is S uniquely associated with only one of the three bodies? If so, the very idea of the thought-experiment becomes questionable. Does S alternate its existence between the three bodies? If it does, how is one to know that it is not replaced by another exactly similar subject of experience on transit from one body to another?

This may, however, be thought to be too short a way with Strawson's story; for it ignores -so it may seem -one perfectly plausible answer to the question, "Where is S?". If we assume with Strawson, for the


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Strawson and Persons and their bodies
โœ W. Dean Hazelton ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1976 ๐Ÿ› Springer Netherlands ๐ŸŒ English โš– 268 KB
More on persons and their bodies
โœ Victor Balowitz ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1975 ๐Ÿ› Springer Netherlands ๐ŸŒ English โš– 90 KB
Our minds and their bodies
โœ John Laird; Beatrix Tudor-Hart ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1926 ๐Ÿ› Guilford Publishing Inc ๐ŸŒ English โš– 161 KB
Body Piercing, Personality, and Sexual B
โœ Keren Skegg; Shyamala Nada-Raja; Charlotte Paul; David C. G. Skegg ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2006 ๐Ÿ› Springer US ๐ŸŒ English โš– 201 KB