𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Persistence of rous sarcoma virus in transformed non-permissive cells: Characteristics of virus induction following sendai virus-mediated fusion with permissive cells

✍ Scribed by Philippe Vigier


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1973
Tongue
French
Weight
834 KB
Volume
11
Category
Article
ISSN
0020-7136

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Virus induction in heterokaryons formed by non‐permissive cells transformed by Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) and permissive chick embryo (CE) cells, in the presence of inactivated Sendai virus, was studied with a clone of hamster BHK21 fibroblasts transformed by Schmidt‐Ruppin strain RSV (clone RS2) and subclones derived from this clone. The main results have been the following: (1) The number of heterokaryons giving rise to foci of Rous cells (focus‐forming infective centers, or FFICs) in mixed cultures is proportional to the number of RS2 cells when the initial CE:RS2 cell ratio attains 30, and almost all heterokaryons are then formed from single RS2 cells. (2) Recovery of FFICs also depends on the dose of Sendai virus. (3) Following fusion of RS2 cells with cells from different chick embryos the recovery of FFICs varies in parallel with the number of foci produced by free virus in cultures of these embryos. (4) The latent period of virus induction from the time of cell fusion is about 24 h, and somewhat longer than that of viral replication in newly infected CE cells. The growth of induced virus is similar to that of virus produced after de novo infection. (5) Virus induction requires no DNA synthesis but is inhibited, reversibly, by treatment for a few hours with inhibitors of DNA‐dependent synthesis (actinomycin D) and protein synthesis (puromycin and cycloheximide). Hence, non‐permissiveness of RS2 cells may be due to a partial block of transcription of the viral replicative DNA (provirus) present in the cells, and induction in heterokaryons to switching from partial to full transcription and translation of the provirus. However, it is also possible that some function, or factor (s) of the CE cells is required for virus production in heterokaryons. (6) The study of a subclone of RS2 cells 100‐ to 1000‐fold less inducible than other subclones suggesting that, in this subclone, non‐permissiveness may be due to a permanent block of synthesis of all viral proteins, at the level of transcription of the provirus.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Persistence of rous sarcoma virus in tra
✍ Philippe Vigier 📂 Article 📅 1972 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French ⚖ 902 KB

## Abstract Virus induction by association of non‐permissive cells transformed by Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) and permissive chicken cells in the absence of Sendai virus has been studied with two clones of BHK21 hamster fibroblasts transformed respectively by Schmidt‐Ruppin strain RSV (clone RS2) and