In a recent letter to the editor, Liu and Bilkey (1998) discussed the differences between their results (Liu and Bilkey, 1997) and ours (Canning and Leung, 1997). In both studies, the perirhinal cortex (PRh) was stimulated at a similar location and the evoked field potentials in the hippocampus were
Perirhinal cortex does not project to the dentate gyrus
โ Scribed by Menno P. Witter; Pieterke A. Naber; Fernando Lopes da Silva
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 281 KB
- Volume
- 9
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1050-9631
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
interested in the factors that might underlie this difference. In both the Canning and Leung and Liu and Bilkey studies, it was shown that single-pulse stimulation of the perirhinal cortex (PRC) evoked field potentials in the hippocampus in urethane-anaesthetised rats. Similarly, in both studies, wh
In urethane-anesthetized rats, cortical regions which provide distal dendritic excitation of the dentate gyrus and CA1 of the dorsal hippocampus were studied using current source density analysis. Electrical stimulation of the lateral perforant path (LPP) in the lateral angular bundle, lateral entor
The electrically induced increase in hippocampal synaptic strength known as long-term potentiation (LTP) is thought to involve some of the same mechanisms as those mediating information storage during spatial learning. Physiological saturation of synaptic weights might therefore be expected to occlu
Acute electrical stimulation of a specific area in the inferior collicular cortex produced bilateral collicular afterdischarge and symmetrical wild running seizures. However, generalized seizures induced by kindling the inferior collicular cortex did not alter the kindling rate in the contralateral