✦ LIBER ✦

Perineometer and digital examination for assessment of pelvic floor strength

✍ Scribed by Y. Uyar; Y.B. Baytur; U. Inceboz

Book ID: 116553986
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2007
Tongue: English
Weight: 44 KB
Volume: 98
Category: Article
ISSN: 0020-7292
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.03.015

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Comparative assessment of pelvic floor s

Comparative assessment of pelvic floor strength using a perineometer and digital examination

✍ P. J. Isherwood; A. Rane 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 439 KB

A comparison of perineometer to brink sc

A comparison of perineometer to brink score for assessment of pelvic floor muscle strength

✍ Andrew F. Hundley; Jennifer M. Wu; Anthony G. Visco 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 251 KB

Application of perineometer in the asses

Application of perineometer in the assessment of pelvic floor muscle strength and endurance: A reliability study

✍ Nahid Rahmani; Mohammad A. Mohseni-Bandpei 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 237 KB

Pelvic floor contraction strength assess

Pelvic floor contraction strength assessment by digital examination was in good agreement with perineometry

✍ Scott A. Farrell 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 238 KB

THE ASSESSMENT OF THE PELVIC FLOOR MUSCL

THE ASSESSMENT OF THE PELVIC FLOOR MUSCLES STRENGTH USING A PERINEOMETER AND A TIME-BASED PROCESSING APPROACH

✍ Filipa Pires; Augusto Gil Pascoal; Hugo Silva 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 103 KB

Pelvic floor maximal strength using vagi

Pelvic floor maximal strength using vaginal digital assessment compared to dynamometric measurements

✍ M. Morin; C. Dumoulin; D. Bourbonnais; D. Gravel; M.-C. Lemieux 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 152 KB

## Abstract ## Aim To compare vaginal digital assessment with dynamometric measurements for determining the maximal strength of the pelvic floor muscles (PFM). ## Materials and Methods Eighty‐nine women aged between 21 and 44 participated in the study. An experienced physiotherapist evaluated th