𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Perineal pad testing in the quantitation of urinary incontinence

✍ Scribed by M. D. Walters; R. A. Dombroski; T. J. Prihoda

Publisher
Springer
Year
1990
Tongue
English
Weight
352 KB
Volume
1
Category
Article
ISSN
0937-3462

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis

EDITORIAL COMMENT: Perineal pad testing for the detection and quantification of urine loss has been the topic of a great deal of discussion amongst urogynecologists in recent years. Various tests have been devised utilizing varying time periods and with an even greater variety of exercise schedules to be followed by the patient during the test or how the results of that test may be used in patient management. As we see from this study, its usefulness in the differentiation of continent women from incontinent women is even questioned. A method to quantify the amount of urine lost by a patient is needed if we are to be able to compare results of surgical procedures and drug studies from investigator to investigator and institution to institution. Continued research in this area is needed.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

An ultra-short perineal pad-test for eva
An ultra-short perineal pad-test for evaluation of female stress urinary incontinence treatment
✍ Jan Persson; Christina EtΓ©n Bergqvist; PΓ₯l WΓΈlner-Hanssen πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2001 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 126 KB

## Abstract We assessed the reproducibility and feasibility of a rapid perineal pad‐test designed for evaluation of stress urinary incontinence treatment. In an experimental study, we included 34 women with genuine stress incontinence, 13 with urge incontinence and 10 non‐incontinent volunteers for

Objective quantification of stress urina
Objective quantification of stress urinary incontinence: A short, reproducible, provocative pad-test
✍ I. Hahn; M. Fall πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1991 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 361 KB

To evaluate the reproducibility, sensitivity, and accuracy of a short, provocative pad-test designed for quantification of urine loss in stress urinary incontinence, 50 women underwent two separate, standardised tests. The tests were performed as part of the urodynamic examination at a bladder volum