𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Performance rebustness of minimum variance and self-tuning regulators to disturbance model mismatch

✍ Scribed by W.R. Cluett; P.R.C. Nelson


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1991
Tongue
English
Weight
815 KB
Volume
46
Category
Article
ISSN
0009-2509

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


This paper addresses the issue of mismatch between the actual disturbance model of a process and an assumed model for controller design. In current practice, process control engineers often avoid estimation of disturbance model parameters and prefer to use estimation schemes with deterministic models in mind. Most practical processes have several unmeasured disturbances acting on them. These disturb-anceS can often be combined from a modelling point of view into a single random sequence. If the structure and parameters of this disturbance model are not to be or cannot be estimated off-line (for minimum variance control) or on-line (for self-tuning control), a design polynomial ( TI) can be used in its place. This paper will examine the performance. trade-off with minimum variance control when the disturbance model is taken as T,. and the robustness of the self-tuning regulator when T, is used as a filter in the parameter 2.

estimation scheme.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Steady-state and parameter tracking prop
✍ Maciej Niedźwiecki 📂 Article 📅 1989 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 484 KB

Abgract~The self-tuning regulator with a fixed gain and a fixed forgetting factor applied to control of an ARX plant is considered. The ordinary differential equation analysis of the closed-loop system is performed in the neighbourhood of the stable equilibrium point and the approximate expressions