𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale with a bioabsorbable occluder device : Single-Centre Experience

✍ Scribed by Gian Paolo Ussia; Valeria Cammalleri; Massimiliano Mulè; Marilena Scarabelli; Marco Barbanti; Francesco Scardaci; Sarah Mangiafico; Sebastiano Immè; Davide Capodanno; Corrado Tamburino


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
192 KB
Volume
74
Category
Article
ISSN
1522-1946

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Background:

Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) is routinely performed with nonbiological devices, characterized by a persistent low‐grade inflammatory response. We report our experience about PFO closure with a bioabsorbable device, BioSTAR® (NMT Inc, USA).

Methods:

From September 2007 to September 2008, 14 patients with migraine (eight with aura) and cerebral magnetic resonance positive for silent ischemia and nine patients with prior cardiovascular accident (CVA) underwent closure of PFO using BioSTAR®. One patient had heterozygosis for sickle‐cell‐anaemia. Nickel allergy was present in eight patients. Echocardiogram was performed at 24 hr, one and 6 months. At 6 and 12 months a contrast‐transcranial‐doppler (c‐TCD) and a trans‐oesophageal echocardiogram (TOE) were scheduled, respectively.

Results:

BioSTAR® was successfully implanted in 22 patients (96%). The mean procedural time and the mean fluoroscopy time were 22 ± 6 and 4 ± 2 minutes, respectively. The mean in‐hospital stay was 3 ± 0.5 days. After a mean follow‐up of 7.8 ± 3.5 months there was an hemorrhagic stroke related to double antiaggregation. No other CVA or allergic reactions were registered. There were two cases of atrial arrhythmia. Fifteen patients had not residual shunts at c‐TCD, while in four patients we observed a trivial microbubbles passage. The TOE, achieved in nine patients without contrast, showed the device well positioned, with a low profile and without thrombus.

Conclusions:

In our experience PFO closure with BioSTAR® is safe and efficacious in preventing recurrent CVA. Its use could be advantageous in patients with nickel allergy and haematological disorders. The potential benefits of this device need to be certified in a larger cohort of patients with a longer follow‐up. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Implantation of a second closure device
✍ Markus Schwerzmann; Stephan Windecker; Andreas Wahl; Krassen Nedeltchev; Heinric 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 230 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) in patients with presumed paradoxical embolism yields complete occlusion in > 90% of patients using contemporary closure devices. Patients with a residual shunt after percutaneous PFO closure have been found at increased risk for recurr