<p>A discussion of American pragmatism through the writings of its three major advocates: Charles S. Peirce, William James, and John Dewey. Examines how each applied pragmatism to, respectively, the theory of reality, the notion of truth, and the concept of the good.</p>
Peirce, James, and a Pragmatic Philosophy of Religion
β Scribed by John W. Woell
- Publisher
- Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
- Year
- 2013
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 225
- Series
- Continuum Studies in American Philosophy Ser.
- Edition
- 1
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
In this book, John W. Woell shows us how contemporary readings of American Pragmatism founded on mistakenly used categories of the Analytic tradition have led to misreadings of Peirce and James. By focusing on terms drawn largely from Descartes and Kant, contemporary debates between metaphysical realists, antirealists, Realists and Nonrealists, have, argues Woell, failed to shed great light on pragmatism in general and a pragmatic philosophy of religion in particular. Woell contends that paying close attention to the internal relationships among inquiry, belief, and their objects in the respective works of Peirce and James provides a means for fully appreciating pragmatism's richness as a resource for philosophy of religion. By taking account of a pragmatic point of view in philosophy of religion, this book incites a more productive discussion of the metaphysical status of religious objects and of the epistemic status of religious belief.
β¦ Subjects
Pragmatism
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
<em>William James and the Transatlantic Conversation</em> focuses on the American philosopher and psychologist William James (1842-1910) and his engagements with European thought, together with the multidisciplinary reception of his work on both sides of the Atlantic since his death. James's encount
In this book, Michael Slater provides a new assessment of pragmatist views in the philosophy of religion. Focusing on the tension between naturalist and anti-naturalist versions of pragmatism, he argues that the anti-naturalist religious views of philosophers such as William James and Charles Peirce
<p><p>This book investigates the conflicts concerning pragmatism in</p><p>Wittgensteinβs work On Certainty, through a comparison with the</p><p>pragmatist tradition as expressed by its founding fathers Charles S. Peirce</p><p>and William James. It also describes Wittgensteinβs first encounters with<