𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Peer review—reject, accept, or major revision?

✍ Scribed by The Lancet Neurology

Book ID
114407499
Publisher
The Lancet
Year
2003
Tongue
English
Weight
42 KB
Volume
2
Category
Article
ISSN
1474-4465

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Erratum Re: ‘Selecting manuscripts for a
Erratum Re: ‘Selecting manuscripts for a high-impact journal through peer review: A citation analysis of communications that were accepted by Agewandte Chemie International Edition, or rejected but published elsewhere’. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59(11) 2008, 1841–1852
📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 93 KB 👁 2 views

Communications and for the statistically significant differences between the individual median values. FIG. 1. Box plots for citation counts, found in Science Citation Index and in Chemical Abstracts by citation searching for two different citation windows, of Communications accepted by AC-IE and of

Abstracts presented at the Veterinary Ca
Abstracts presented at the Veterinary Cancer Society Annual Conference Kansas City, Missouri, 3–6th November 2004 : As the official journal of the Veterinary Cancer Society, Veterinary and Comparative Oncology is pleased to include these abstracts from the Annual Conference and we hope you find them informative and useful. These abstracts have not been subjected to peer review or editorial revision, however, and it would be prudent for the reader to exercise caution in the interpretation and application of the data presented.
📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 196 KB