The purpose of this study was to explore in greater depth what has been called by previous researchers, a deep versus surface approach to learning science. Six Grade 8 students judged as typically using learning approaches ranging from deep to surface were observed and taped during class group labor
Pedagogies of engagement in science : A comparison of PBL, POGIL, and PLTL
✍ Scribed by Thomas Eberlein; Jack Kampmeier; Vicky Minderhout; Richard S. Moog; Terry Platt; Pratibha Varma-Nelson; Harold B. White
- Publisher
- The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 129 KB
- Volume
- 36
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1470-8175
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Problem‐based learning, process‐oriented guided inquiry learning, and peer‐led team learning are student‐centered, active‐learning pedagogies commonly used in science education. The characteristic features of each are compared and contrasted to enable new practitioners to decide which approach or combination of approaches will suit their particular situation.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract The journal structure in the **__China Scientific and Technical Papers and Citations Database__** (**__CSTPCD__**) is analyzed from three perspectives: the database level, the specialty level, and the institutional level (i.e., university journals vs. journals issued by the Chinese Acad
computer graphics and paintings from the Scottish National Portrait Gallery. These devices ®t seamlessly with the text to allow research on face processing, and by way of that, cognitive psychology in general, to be understood by a wider audience. It works for me. Not only would I recommend it as a