๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Pecuniary compensation increases participation in screening for colorectal cancer

โœ Scribed by Eline Aas


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
165 KB
Volume
18
Category
Article
ISSN
1057-9230

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Abstract

The participation rate in medical screening programmes is typically below 100%, which means that not all potential health benefits are fully exploited. In this paper, the prospect of pecuniary compensation is tested as a method of increasing the participation rate. We propose a model explaining the individual's probability of participating in screening for colorectal cancer when he is offered pecuniary compensation, given that he did not participate when first invited. The participant's decision is based on both known and uncertain factors. The estimation is conducted in two steps, where a binary probit model is used in each. We find that pecuniary compensation increases the probability of participation, and that an individual's participation probability systematically varies with variables such as travel expenses, income, age, education level, expected benefit from the screening, use of healthโ€care services, genetic predisposition and subjective health status. Using the results from the estimation, we predict changes in the participation rate for different levels of compensation and estimate the cost per additional individual screened. The cost per additional individual screened is 808, including 25 in compensation; this cost increases with the level of compensation. Copyright ยฉ 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Toward understanding nonparticipation in
โœ Johannes Blom; Li Yin; Annika Lidรฉn; Anders Dolk; Bengt Jeppsson; Lars Pรฅhlman; ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2007 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ French โš– 127 KB

## Abstract Understanding the reasons for nonparticipation in cancer screening may give clues about how to improve compliance. However, limited cooperation has hampered research on nonparticipant profiles. We took advantage of Sweden's comprehensive demographic and health care registers to investig