𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Patients' expectations and success criteria for liver transplantation

✍ Scribed by James R. Rodrigue; Douglas W. Hanto; Michael P. Curry


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2011
Tongue
English
Weight
251 KB
Volume
17
Category
Article
ISSN
1527-6465

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Patient-reported outcomes are important to consider when the relative success of liver transplantation (LT) is being evaluated. Our primary objective was to examine the expectations for LT and the criteria for its success across 4 domains of functioning (pain, fatigue, emotional distress, and interference with daily activities) from the perspective of patients who were wait-listed for LT. One hundred four adult patients with a mean wait-list time of 16.5 6 13 months completed a semistructured interview with a modified version of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Questionnaire (PCOQ). The patients reported moderate usual levels of pain, fatigue, emotional distress, and interference with daily activities (mean rating range ΒΌ 3.8-6.2), and they attached great importance to improvements in these domains after LT (mean rating range ΒΌ 7.3-8.0). Patients considered a mean reduction in pain of 33% to be a successful LT outcome. A reduction in fatigue of 56%, a reduction in emotional distress of 44%, and a reduction in interference with daily activities of 54% represented successful LT across these domains. Patients with more severe illness had higher expectations for fatigue (r ΒΌ Γ€0.30, P ΒΌ 0.002) and interference with daily activities (r ΒΌ Γ€0.24, P ΒΌ 0.015). Cluster and correlational analyses provided support for the validity of the PCOQ with LT patients. Our findings underscore the importance and value of using patient-centered assessments to better understand the ways in which patients prioritize LT outcomes and define transplantation success. Patient-centered assessments have the potential to facilitate provider-patient communication by helping patients to prioritize their goals for LT and make informed choices on the basis of those priorities.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Selection criteria for liver transplant
✍ Dr. Timothy J. Schroeder; Amadeo J. Pesce; Frederick C. Ryckman; Thomas P. Tress πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1991 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 267 KB

donors excluded in group I had acceptable MEGX values indicating they may have been transplantable. Ten of 12 patients excluded in groups II B-D had normal LFT's and nine of 12 had acceptable MEGX values indicating they may have been transplantable also. In this era of organ shortage, a reevaluation

Expanded criteria for liver transplantat
✍ Mauricio Silva; Angel Moya; Marina Berenguer; Fernando Sanjuan; Rafael LΓ³pez-And πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2008 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 189 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) selection for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a matter of debate. The Milan criteria (MC) have been largely adopted by the international community. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the survival rates and recurrence probabilities of a n

Liver transplantation in patients with h
✍ J. Ignacio Herrero; Bruno Sangro; Fernando Pardo; Jorge Quiroga; Mercedes IΓ±arra πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2008 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 173 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

Milan criteria are the most frequently used limits for liver transplantation (LT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but our previous experience with expanded criteria showed encouraging results. The aim of this study was to investigate whether our expanded Clinica Universitaria de Nav