𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Pathologic models to predict outcome for women with endometrial adenocarcinoma: The importance of the distinction between surgical stage and clinical stage--A gynecologic oncology group study

✍ Scribed by Richard J. Zaino; Robert J. Kurman; Karen L. Diana; C. Paul Morrow


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1996
Tongue
English
Weight
588 KB
Volume
77
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Numerous pathologic factors have heen identified as important in predicting outcome for women with endometrial adenocarcinoma. However, most patients have a mixture of good and bad factors. For these women, the prognosis is uncertain, and it is often unclear whether postoperative therapy is indicated.

METHODS. llsing univariate and multivariate analysis, we investigated the pathologic factors commonly reported to he of prognostic significance, using data from 819 patients with clinical Stages I and I1 endometrial adenocarcinorna from a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Since the clinical stage frequently underestimated the surgical stage, models that designate the relative risk associated wirh each of the variables were created for both clinical and surgical Stage 1 and I1 patients.

RESULTS.

We confirmed the importance of age, depth of myometrial invasion, and to a lesser degree, histologic grade, and cell type, as independent prognostic variables.

CONCLUSIONS.

The relative risk of death can he determined using a simple multiplicative calculation, and the absolute risk can he estimated by inspection of the accompanying figures. These data can be used to provide patients with prognostic information and to help determine the need for postoperative adjuvant therapy.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES