๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Path-Star Ramsey numbers

โœ Scribed by T.D Parsons


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1974
Tongue
English
Weight
373 KB
Volume
17
Category
Article
ISSN
0095-8956

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Path-cycle Ramsey numbers
โœ R.J. Faudree; S.L. Lawrence; T.D. Parsons; R.H. Schelp ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1974 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 1000 KB

I Retaefltiy, Ramsey numbers have been obtained for several &sses of graphs. In particthey have been studied for hs of low wder, pairs of paths, paks of cycles, and for a . In this paper, th rs atie obtained fair aI3 pa&cycle pairs,

Path Ramsey numbers in multicolorings
โœ R.J Faudree; R.H Schelp ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1975 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 619 KB
More star sub-ramsey numbers
โœ Geลˆa Hahn ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1981 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 841 KB
Tripartite Ramsey numbers for paths
โœ Andrรกs Gyรกrfรกs; Miklรณs Ruszinkรณ; Gรกbor N. Sรกrkรถzy; Endre Szemerรฉdi ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2007 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 137 KB

## Abstract In this article, we study the tripartite Ramsey numbers of paths. We show that in any twoโ€coloring of the edges of the complete tripartite graph __K__(__n__, __n__, __n__) there is a monochromatic path of length (1 โˆ’ __o__(1))2__n__. Since __R__(__P__~2__n__+1~,__P__~2__n__+1~)=3__n__,

Size Ramsey numbers involving stars
โœ R.J. Faudree; J. Sheehan ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1983 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 302 KB

We calculate some size Ramsey numbers involving stars. For example we prove that for t ~ k w2 ~md n sufficiently large the size Ramsey number r,, (K,,k All graphs in this paper are finite, simple and undirected. Let F, C and H be graphs. The number of vertices and edges of a graph F will be denoted

A result on C4-star Ramsey numbers
โœ Guantao Chen ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 140 KB

In this paper, we will show that the Ramsey number r(C4,Ki,n+l)<~r(C4,Ki,n)+ 2 for all positive integers n. This result answers a question proposed by Burr, Erd6s, Faudree, Rousseau, and Schelp.