𝔖 Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

πŸ“

Past and Process in Herodotus and Thucydides

✍ Scribed by Virginia J. Hunter


Publisher
Princeton University Press
Year
2017
Tongue
English
Leaves
391
Series
Princeton Legacy Library; 5090
Category
Library

⬇  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


This is the first systematic attempt to compare Herodotus and Thucydides as contemporaries, that is, as pre- Socratic thinkers who employed rather similar concepts and intellectual tools and who worked within the same theoretical framework or space. The work also brings to the study of the ancient historians widely accepted and recognizable concepts derived from contemporary historiography and the methodology of the social sciences.

Originally published in 1982.

The Princeton Legacy Library uses the latest print-on-demand technology to again make available previously out-of-print books from the distinguished backlist of Princeton University Press. These editions preserve the original texts of these important books while presenting them in durable paperback and hardcover editions. The goal of the Princeton Legacy Library is to vastly increase access to the rich scholarly heritage found in the thousands of books published by Princeton University Press since its founding in 1905.

✦ Table of Contents


CONTENTS
PREFACE
ABBREVIATIONS
INTRODUCTION
PART I. The Past: Enquiry and Interpretation
ONE. Mankind's Progress to Civilization in Greece: Thucydides' Archaeology and the Problems of Power
TWO. The Discovery of β€œHistorical Space”: Herodotus and the Beginnings of Human History in Egypt
THREE. Herodotus and Thucydides and le temps des hommes
PART II. The Process of History
FOUR. Generalization, Process, and Event: Thucydides' Explanation of Brasidas' Successes in Thrace
FIVE. Cause, Event, and Chronology in Relation to Process: Herodotus' Explanation of Dareios' Retreat from Scythia
Six. Historical Process and its Implications for Herodotus and Thucydides
APPENDIXES
APPENDIX TO CHAPTER ONE
APPENDIX TO CHAPTER TWO
APPENDIX TO CHAPTER FOUR
APPENDIX TO CHAPTER FIVE
APPENDIX TO CHAPTER SIX
GLOSSARY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
INDEX OF REFERENCES TO HERODOTUS AND THUCYDIDES
GENERAL INDEX


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Past and Process in Herodotus and Thucyd
✍ Hunter, Virginia J. πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2017 πŸ› Princeton University Press 🌐 English

This is the first systematic attempt to compare Herodotus and Thucydides as contemporaries, that is, as pre- Socratic thinkers who employed rather similar concepts and intellectual tools and who worked within the same theoretical framework or space. The work also brings to the study of the ancient h

Gestaltung und Funktion der Reden bei He
✍ Carlo Scardino πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2007 πŸ› Walter De Gruyter 🌐 German

For the modern reader, the use of direct speech, which is normally fictional, is one of the most remarkable features of ancient historiography. On the basis of a study of the rhetorical form and of the motifs employed in speeches by Herodotus and Thucydides, the author is able to expound systematica

Thucydides and Herodotus
✍ Edith Foster; Donald Lateiner πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2012 πŸ› Oxford University Press (UK) 🌐 English

This edited collection looks at two of the most important ancient Greek historians living in the 5th Century BCE who are considered to be the founders of the western tradition of historiography. <em>Thucydides and Herodotus</em> examines the relevant relationship between these historians which is co

Embedded Inscriptions in Herodotus and T
✍ Benjamin Allgaier πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2022 πŸ› Harrassowitz Verlag 🌐 English

The two founding works of the Western historiographical tradition, Herodotus’ Histories and Thucydides’ History, feature, among many other things, mentions and quotations of inscriptions (that is, texts written on durable materials such as stone). This book explores the epigraphic dimension of Hero

Experience and Teleology in Ancient Hist
✍ Jonas Grethlein πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2020 πŸ› Cambridge University Press 🌐 English

The past is narrated in retrospect. Historians can either capitalize on the benefit of hindsight and give their narratives a strongly teleological design or they may try to render the past as it was experienced by historical agents and contemporaries. This book explores the fundamental tension betwe