W e read with interest the study by Hassan and colleagues 1 that evaluated a possible association between passive smoking and pancreatic cancer. The authors report that passive smoking is not a significant risk factor for pancreatic cancer, although it may increase the risk in smokers who are also e
Passive smoking and the use of noncigarette tobacco products in association with risk for pancreatic cancer: A case-control study
✍ Scribed by Manal M. Hassan; James L. Abbruzzese; Melissa L. Bondy; Robert A. Wolff; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Peter W. Pisters; Douglas B. Evans; Rabia Khan; Renato Lenzi; Li Jiao; Donghui Li
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 102 KB
- Volume
- 109
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0008-543X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
BACKGROUND.
The associations between passive smoking and the use of noncigarette tobacco products with pancreatic cancer are not clear.
METHODS.
In this case‐control study, the authors collected information on passive smoking and the use of noncigarette tobacco products in 808 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and 808 healthy controls by personal interview. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to estimate the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI).
RESULTS.
The results confirmed the previously reported association between active smoking and increased risk for pancreatic cancer. The AOR was 1.7 (95% CI, 1.4–2.2) for regular smokers, 1.8 (95% CI, 1.4–2.4) for long‐term smokers, and 3.1 (95% CI, 2.2–4.3) for former smokers. Although passive smoking showed a nonsignificantly elevated risk for pancreatic cancer in the entire study population (AOR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.9–1.7), the association was present among ever smokers (AOR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.03–2.6) but was absent among never smokers (AOR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.8–1.6). Neither intensity nor duration of passive smoking modified the risk of pancreatic cancer among never smokers. The use of chewing tobacco, snuff, and pipes showed no significant risk elevation for pancreatic cancer after controlling for the confounding effects of demographics and other known risk factors. The use of cigars in never smokers showed a borderline significant increase of risk for pancreatic cancer (AOR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.0–4.7; P = .05).
CONCLUSIONS.
The current observations did not support a role for passive smoking or the use of noncigarette tobacco products in the etiology of pancreatic cancer. The association between cigar use and the risk of pancreatic cancer needs to be confirmed in other study populations. Cancer 2007. © 2007 American Cancer Society.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
W e read with interest the study by Hassan and colleagues 1 that evaluated a possible association between passive smoking and pancreatic cancer. The authors report that passive smoking is not a significant risk factor for pancreatic cancer, although it may increase the risk in smokers who are also e
## Abstract Although tobacco smoking has long been recognized as a major risk factor for cancer of the upper aero‐digestive tract (UADT, __i.e__., oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, and oesophagus), very few studies have provided estimates of the effect of very low tobacco consumption. Step‐functions ha
## Abstract Genetic backgrounds may modify the association of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) with lung cancer risk. Polymorphisms of both the activating and detoxifying enzymes, cytochrome P4501A1 (CYP1A1) and glutathione‐S‐transferase M1 (GSTM1), may be important as genetic factors. We conducte
## Abstract Cyclin D1 (CCND1) and E‐cadherin (CDH1) have been shown to be important genes of the β‐catenin/LEF pathway that is involved in colorectal carcinogenesis. However, epidemiological studies on relationship between genetic variants of these two genes and colorectal cancer (CRC) have shown i
## Abstract Vitamin D inhibits the development and growth of prostate cancer cells. Epidemiologic results on serum vitamin D levels and prostate cancer risk have, however, been inconsistent. We conducted a longitudinal nested case‐control study on Nordic men (Norway, Finland and Sweden) using serum