## Abstract ## Background and Objectives Vascular infiltration (VI) is an important prognostic factor for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and predictive parameters are necessary to preoperatively decide treatment strategies in patients with HCC. ## Methods Relationships between presence and degre
Partial hepatectomy as first-line treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
✍ Scribed by Umberto Cillo; Alessandro Vitale; Alberto Brolese; Giacomo Zanus; Daniele Neri; Michele Valmasoni; Pasquale Bonsignore; Francesco Grigoletto; Patrizia Burra; Fabio Farinati; Davide Francesco D'Amico
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 262 KB
- Volume
- 95
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0022-4790
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Background
Partial hepatectomy (PH) and liver transplantation (LT) compete as first‐line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A prospectively collected database was retrospectively reviewed to establish when PH can compete with LT.
Methods
Between 1991 and 2002, PH was performed in 131 cases of HCC (Child‐Pugh A–B, technically resectable tumor without metastases). To ascertain patient survival after PH, we compared this series with a group of 40 HCC patients (G1–G2 HCC with no gross vascular invasion or metastasis) enlisted for liver transplantation during the same period.
Results
The 1‐, 3‐, and 5‐year intention‐to‐treat survival rates were 75%, 52%, and 31% for resection and 89%, 71%, and 63% for transplantation. Two tumor‐related variables (gross vascular invasion and histological grade) and three liver function parameters (Child‐Pugh score, bilirubin, Okuda stage) proved to be independent predictors of survival after resection, whereas nodule size and number, and Milan criteria did not. The 5‐year survival of the best candidates for resection (favorable tumor biology with very well preserved liver function, n = 52) was 58%. On a descriptive basis alone, this result did not differ significantly from the outcome in LT patients. PH patients with a poorly differentiated tumor and/or gross vascular invasion (n = 28) had the worst outcome, irrespective of their liver function parameters.
Conclusions
For technically resectable tumors without aggressive features (G3 or macroscopic vascular invasion), PH can only compete with LT, in terms of long‐term survival, when patients with a well‐preserved liver function are selected. J. Surg. Oncol. 2007;95:213–220. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
The treatment of patients with compensated liver cirrhosis and small hepatocarcinomas remains controversial. Whereas partial hepatectomy (PH) is currently recommended, the role of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has become progressively accepted. We used the techniques of decision analysis to
Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has evolved to represent an important surgical strategy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, due to disadvantages, including donor risks and higher rates of perioperative complications, LDLT has been considered as a second-line treatmen
## Abstract ## BACKGROUND The therapeutic results of nonsurgical treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have been poor, and improved treatments are needed. The authors recently developed a new technique called __angiographic subsegmentectomy__ for the treatment of patients with