๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Parsimonious modelling and forecasting of seasonal time series

โœ Scribed by S.A. Roberts; P.J. Harrison


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1984
Tongue
English
Weight
840 KB
Volume
16
Category
Article
ISSN
0377-2217

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Forecasting time series with increasing
โœ Bruce L. Bowerman; Anne'b. Koehler; David J. Pack ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1990 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 914 KB

Four options for modeling and forecasting time series data containing increasing seasonal variation are discussed, including data trans formations, double seasonal difference models and two kinds of transfer function-type ARIMA models employing seasonal dummy variables. An explanation is given for t

Forecasting non-seasonal time series wit
โœ Magne Aldrin; Eivind Damsleth ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1989 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 856 KB

Most forecasting methods are based on equally spaced data. In the case of missing observations the methods have to be modified. We have considered three smoothing methods: namely, simple exponential smoothing; double exponential smoothing; and Holt's method. We present a new, unified approach to han

The impact of seasonal constants on fore
โœ Robert M. Kunst; Philip Hans Franses ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 240 KB

In this paper we focus on the eect of (i) deleting, (ii) restricting or (iii) not restricting seasonal intercept terms on forecasting sets of seasonally cointegrated macroeconomic time series for Austria, Germany and the UK. A ยฎrst empirical result is that the number of cointegrating vectors as well

Parsimonious modeling and forecasting of
โœ Wei-Choun Yu; Donald M. Salyards ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 504 KB

## Abstract This paper investigates the sensitivity of outโ€ofโ€sample forecasting performance over a span of different parameters of l in the dynamic Nelsonโ€“Siegel threeโ€factor AR(1) model. First, we find that the ad hoc selection of l is not optimal. Second, we find a substantial difference in fact