✦ LIBER ✦

Paper 40: The Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) of the Mahorn Quality of Life Tool

✍ Scribed by Lisa Phillips; Nick Mohtadi; Denise Chan

Book ID: 116257459
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2011
Tongue: English
Weight: 69 KB
Volume: 27
Category: Article
ISSN: 0749-8063
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.11.053

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

The minimal clinically important differe

The minimal clinically important difference in the Gastrointestinal Quality-of-Life Index after cholecystectomy

✍ Hon-Yi Shi; King-Teh Lee; Hao-Hsien Lee; Yih-Huei Uen; Hsueh-Li Na; Fang-Tse Cha 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 148 KB

Minimal important difference (MID) of th

Minimal important difference (MID) of the Dermatology Life Quality Index in patients with axillary and palmar hyperhidrosis

📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 53 KB

Responsiveness, Minimal Detectable Chang

Responsiveness, Minimal Detectable Change, and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale in Patients With Improved Performance After Stroke Rehabilitation

✍ Ching-yi Wu; Li-ling Chuang; Keh-chung Lin; Shin-da Lee; Wei-hsien Hong 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 223 KB

The quality of spine surgery from the pa

The quality of spine surgery from the patient’s perspective: Part 2. Minimal clinically important difference for improvement and deterioration as measured with the Core Outcome Measures Index

✍ A. F. Mannion; F. Porchet; F. S. Kleinstück; F. Lattig; D. Jeszenszky; V. Bartan 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 214 KB

In prospective study using Specific Qual

In prospective study using Specific Quality of Life & Outcomes Response-Venous (SQOR-V) questionnaire the recall bias had the same magnitude as the minimally important difference

✍ Fedor Lurie; Robert L. Kistner 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 195 KB

Prospective evaluation of the reliabilit

Prospective evaluation of the reliability, validity, and minimally important difference of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-gastric (FACT-Ga) quality-of-life instrument

✍ Sheila N. Garland; Guy Pelletier; Andrew Lawe; Bradly J. Biagioni; Jay Easaw; Mi 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 194 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND: Recently, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy‐Gastric (FACT‐Ga) was developed to measure the quality of life (QoL) of patients with gastric cancer. This newly developed instrument has not yet been validated. ## METHODS: Eighty‐two patients with gastric adenocar